2010-UNAT-006, Hussein
UNAT considered the Appellant鈥檚 appeal and upheld UNDT鈥檚 judgment. UNAT noted that the Appellant鈥檚 request that her challenge of the first recruitment process be placed in abeyance until completion of the second recruitment process was unusual and rightly declined by UNDT. UNAT held that no right of the Appellant was infringed upon, as she had not been denied an opportunity to compete for the post in question. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed UNDT鈥檚 judgment.