2010-UNAT-044, Solanki
UNAT preliminarily held that the Appellant had not identified any exceptional circumstances justifying the need to file observations in reply to the Secretary-General鈥檚 answer. UNAT held that the observations would not be taken into consideration. UNAT held that UNDT had correctly observed that it was not able to substitute itself for the Administration or to declare that the Appellant should have been promoted to the P-5 level. Regarding the Appellant鈥檚 contention about the quantum of compensation, UNAT held that UNDT was in the best position to decide on the level of compensation given its...