2011-UNAT-149, Verschuur
UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that it was not for the head of department to intervene in the evaluation process conducted by the programme manager, the Central Review Body and, where applicable, the panel. UNAT held that the head of department is not entitled to drop a candidate from the list of qualified candidates and, consequently, from the roster of candidates who have been recognised as qualified. UNAT held that the Executive Director鈥檚 actions disregarded Mr Verschur鈥檚 right to benefit from the advantage of being included on the roster for a year and she...