2012-UNAT-213, Squassoni
UNAT held that UNDT previously addressed the issues at hand and, therefore, there were no grounds to consider that the Appellant鈥檚 rights to due process were violated by a judgment by default or by not considering her arguments. UNAT noted that UNDT did not err in concluding that there was no administrative decision concerning the Appellant鈥檚 return to the G-4 post capable of judicial review under Article 2(1) of the UNDT Statute, as that return was the predictable and logical consequence of her non-selection. UNAT relied on its holding in Zhang (2010-UNAT-078) and held that UNDT correctly...