2013-UNAT-369, Darwish
UNAT affirmed the UNRWA DT decision that the application was not receivable as consistent with UNRWA Area Staff Rule 111. 2 and Article 8 of the UNRWA DT Statute. On alleged errors in procedure, UNAT noted that the Appellant had no opportunity to challenge the untimeliness of the Commissioner-General鈥檚 reply before UNRWA DT, but that, since the Appellant had not demonstrated how the untimely reply affected UNRWA DT鈥檚 decision on receivability, UNAT found no merit on this ground. UNAT held that there was no error in UNRWA DT鈥檚 reasoning on the issue of EVR. UNAT held that, absent an appealable...