2014-UNAT-490, Dzuverovic
UNAT considered Ms Dzuverovic鈥檚 Application for Interpretation of judgment, specifically the portion that dismissed the Secretary-General鈥檚 cross-appeal to redact the recommendations made by UNDT and thus allowed them to remain despite the fact that Ms Dzuverovic鈥檚 UNDT application was not receivable. UNAT held that it explained the meaning and scope of its decision to dismiss the Secretary-General鈥檚 cross-appeal and not to redact the UNDT recommendations when it stated that the recommendations had no binding consequences on the parties. UNAT found that the judgment was not ambiguous and...