2015-UNAT-557, Kazazi
As a preliminary matter, UNAT denied the Appellant鈥檚 application for confidentiality. UNAT rejected the Appellant鈥檚 contention that the Senior Human Resources Officer did not have the appropriate authority to take the contested decision and that such power lay only with the Director of Administration. UNAT held, in agreement with UNDT, that the e-mail from the Senior Human Resources Officer conveyed a clear and definite administrative decision with direct legal consequences for the Appellant. UNAT held, in agreement with UNDT, that the subsequent response from the Director of Administration...