2015-UNAT-606, Hayek
As a preliminary matter, UNAT found that there were no exceptional circumstances to warrant the granting of the Appellant鈥檚 motion for leave to file a reply to the Commissioner-General鈥檚 answer and denied the motion. UNAT held that the UNRWA鈥檚 findings that the application was not receivable ratione temporis because it was filed more than three years after the receipt of the termination decision and that UNRWA DT had no discretion to waive the regulatory time limit of three years, were unassailable. UNAT held that UNRWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable ratione...