2017-UNAT-740, Auda
UNAT held that there was no merit to the Appellant鈥檚 claims that UNDT failed to exercise its jurisdiction or erred in law by using the summary judgment procedure to determine the application was not receivable ratione materiae. UNAT held that the application to UNDT did not challenge an administrative decision that was alleged to be in non-compliance with the terms of appointment or the contract of employment of the staff member, rather the Appellant challenged the MEU鈥檚 wording in a letter to him acknowledging the receipt of his grievance or complaint. UNAT held that UNDT did not err in law...