2017-UNAT-781, Rajan
UNAT considered the Secretary-General鈥檚 appeal. UNAT dismissed Mr Rajan鈥檚 motion for the appeal to be heard on an expedited basis as it had become moot as the ordinary case management constraints meant it could not have been heard any earlier. UNAT held that the UNDT made an error of law in holding that the Secretary-General was obliged to prove that Mr Rajan had the intention to mislead the Organisation. UNAT held that there was no doubt that Mr Rajan misrepresented the true situation more than once. UNAT held that it was Mr Rajan鈥檚 responsibility to ascertain that he was providing accurate...