2019-UNAT-926, Ross 2021-03-18
UNAT considered both an appeal from the Secretary-General and an appeal from Mr Ross. UNAT considered Mr Ross鈥檚 request for consideration by a full bench and held that he had no standing to make such a request and that the case did not raise any significant question of law in relation to the evidentiary standard of proof of moral damages. UNAT held that any irregularity (procedural or substantive) in promotion cases will only give rise to an entitlement to rescission or compensation if the staff member has a significant or foreseeable chance for promotion. UNAT held that the UNDT did not err...