2019-UNAT-973, Gisage
MOn the issue of receivability, UNAT held that UNDT erred in concluding that the application was receivable in its entirety, as each of the three decisions taken on ALWOP were distinct and the Appellant failed to seek management evaluation of the first and second decisions. UNAT held the application was only receivable ratione materiae in respect of the third and last decision. UNAT held that UNDT鈥檚 finding that no exceptional circumstances existed to warrant the extension of the Appellant鈥檚 ALWOP was a material error of law. UNAT held that UNDT erred in concluding that 12 months ALWOP was...