2019-UNAT-974, Salah
UNAT held that the Appellant failed to identify grounds for his appeal. UNAT held that the Appellant鈥檚 case was fully and fairly considered. UNAT held that UNRWA DT correctly based its conclusion about the legality of the termination decision on the medical assessment by the medical board and without medical findings of its own. UNAT held that the decision to terminate the Appellant鈥檚 appointment on medical grounds was a reasonable and valid exercise of UNRWA鈥檚 discretion. UNAT held that the Appellant did not meet the burden of proof of demonstrating an error in the impugned judgment such as...