2022-UNAT-1234, Gabriel Branglidor
Mr. Branglidor appealed. UNAT found that the totality of the evidence confirmed the UNDT鈥檚 conclusion that Mr. Branglidor was well aware of the untruthfulness of the forms when he submitted the second claim for the regular disbursement of the education grant. UNAT was satisifed that the UNDT was correct when it held that the act of misconduct was committed with knowledge and intent. Even though the misconduct did not lead to any actual prejudice, since the Administration recovered the payment made in advance and did not pay any further education grant, Mr. Branglidor鈥檚 endeavor could have...