2023-UNAT-1382, Flamur Kazazi
The UNAT held that the UNDT did not commit an error of procedure in its case management that affected the outcome of the case. The Appellant had a meaningful opportunity to mount a defense and to question the veracity of the statements against him. The additional witnesses that he wished to call would have been of little assistance to his case.
The UNAT found that the UNDT correctly concluded that the alleged conduct was established by clear and convincing evidence and that the Appellant鈥檚 actions, i.e., making inappropriate comments of a sexual nature in social settings, amounted to sexual...