2025-UNAT-1539, Desire Hatungimana
The UNAT held that the UNDT acted correctly by conducting a judicial review of the case.
It found that the UNDT properly assessed the credibility of the witnesses who testified before it and correctly relied on the credible testimony of Ms. V, who had no motive to lie, to conclude that it had been established by clear and convincing evidence that the former staff member had sexually harassed her by making comments of a sexual nature in May and December 2020. While Ms. V鈥檚 testimony alone would have been sufficient in this context, the UNAT noted that it was corroborated by colleagues who were...