2025-UNAT-1534, Dionette Pino Genayas
The UNAT noted that months after the death of the participant in the Fund, the Appellant had produced Pens.A/2 forms purporting to change the designation of the beneficiary of the residual settlement, executed by a thumbprint and not the participant鈥檚 signature. The UNAT also noted the medical evidence of signs of the participant鈥檚 dementia.
The UNAT found that the Appellant had provided no evidence to support the contention that the participant鈥檚 mental capacity had improved by the time of thumbprinting the later forms. The UNAT held that the Fund had not erred when it found those forms...