\n| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tANNEXES\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n \n\n| \n I.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n ITINERARY OF THE MISSION OF THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n II.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE JORDANIAN AUTHORITIES<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n III.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n AIDE-MEMOIRE PREPARED BY THE JORDANIAN AUTHORITIES<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n IV.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n STATEMENT ON THE SITUATION ON THE WEST BANK BY AN OFFICIAL JORDANIAN SPOKESMAN, SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE JORDANIAN AUTHORITIES<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n V.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n FIRST AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE ISRAEL AUTHORITIES ON THE SITUATION ON THE WEST BANK <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n VI.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n SECOND AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE ISRAEL AUTHORITIES ON THE SITUATION ON THE WEST BANK <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n VII.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE ISRAEL AUTHORITIES ENTITLED "FOUNDATIONS OF ISRAEL'S ECONOMIC POLICY IN THE AREAS UNDER ITS CONTROL" .<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n VIII.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE ISRAEL AUTHORITIES ON THE SITUATION IN THE GAZA STRIP AND NORTHERN SINAI <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| \n IX.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n AIDE-MEMOIRE SUBMITTED TO THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE BY THE ISRAEL AUTHORITIES ON THE SITUATION IN THE GAZA STRIP <\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| <\/td>\n | <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tINTRODUCTION\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t1. By its resolution 237 (1967) of 14 June 1967, the Security Council called upon the Government of Israel to ensure the safety, welfare and security of the inhabitants of the areas where military operations had taken place and to facilitate the return of those inhabitants who had fled the areas since the outbreak of hostilities, recommended to the Governments concerned the scrupulous respect of the humanitarian principles governing the treatment of prisoners of war and the protection of civilian persons in time of war contained in the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, and requested the Secretary-General to follow the effective implementation of the resolution and to report to the Security Council. This resolution was later welcomed with great satisfaction by the General Assembly in the letter's resolution 2252 (ES-V) of 4 July 1967.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t2. On 6 July the Secretary-General appointed Mr. Nils-Göran Gussing as his Special Representative to obtain for him on the spot the information required for the proper discharge of his responsibilities under the above resolution of the Security Council.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t3. An interim report on Mr. Gussing's activities was submitted by the Secretary-General to the Security Council and the General Assembly on 18 August (A\/6787, S\/8124). The annual report which the Commissioner General of UNRWA will submit shortly to the General Assembly on his activities is of course related to some aspects of the work of Mr. Gussing. The present report is based on the information contained in the final report of Mr. Gussing to the Secretary-General.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\tI. MISSION OF THE SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t4. The Special Representative's mission was both complex and difficult. His main task was to report on conditions affecting civilian populations and prisoners of war in the aftermath of the war. The main subjects to be looked into were in themselves delicate and wide in scope. They were: the situation of the population in areas now under Israel control; the measures taken to shelter and to facilitate the return of those who had fled; the treatment of prisoners of war and the protection of civilians .\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t5. This task involved extensive travel in an area where itineraries are often complicated by the absence of direct communications between the countries concerned. The gathering of accurate information is not easy in a period following active hostilities and when communications and administration are upset and strong tensions and emotions prevail. Some of the information received was contradictory and difficult to verify. Moreover, the time at the disposal of the Special Representative was very limited because of the obligation of the Secretary -General to report to the General Assembly without undue delay. It was not expected therefore that he would or could undertake to investigate the large number of individual complaints submitted either to the Secretary-General or directly to the Special Representative himself .\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t6. In the light of these considerations, the Special Representative has concentrated on obtaining an over-all view of the situation and of the main problems which face the groups of the population affected by the recent hostilities with which he was particularly concerned.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t7. The Special Representative main activities during his time in the Near East were:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Obtaining through travel and field visits (an itinerary of his travels is attached as annex l) to the maximum extent possible a direct impression of the areas where hostilities had taken place, and of their inhabitants, as well as of the condition of displaced persons elsewhere;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(b) Meeting government officials at the highest level of central government as well as at the level of province, district and local administration;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(c) Meeting spokesmen of the local populations, of refugees, and of detainees;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(d) Meeting representatives of United Nations agencies and offices with direct knowledge of the areas and populations involved, in particular, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization in Palestine (UNTSO), the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) offices, and the United Nations Economic and Social Office in Beirut (UNESOB);\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(e) Meeting representatives of other international agencies working in these areas, in particular, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and a number of voluntary agencies.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t8. During his visits to the Governments in the area, opportunities have arisen to discuss solutions to urgent problems, such as the return of displaced persons. The presence of the Special Representative has also served to remind displaced persons, , prisoners of war and the population of occupied areas that their problems are a serious preoccupation to the United Nations and that efforts are being made to alleviate their hardships.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t9. The Special Representative received excellent co-operation at all levels in the countries he visited. He was allowed full freedom of movement and given every assistance, such as transportation and the necessary arrangements for visits. Nevertheless, when travelling officially, in all the countries concerned the Special Representative met with spokesmen of the civilian population, displaced persons, prisoners of war and local authorities only in the company of representatives of the Government. Particularly in the occupied areas it would have been of great psychological importance and would have provided for franker exchanges for the Special Representative and for the people to whom he spoke if he had had the opportunity to meet and talk without witnesses to whomever he wished. This view was conveyed to Israel government representatives, but without result. 10. Although the Special Representative visited Jerusalem, he was not able to pay the same attention to this city as he was to other areas, nor was it necessary for f him to do so in view of the appointment by the Secretary-General of a Personal Representative to gather information specifically on the situation in Jerusalem (see A\/6793, S\/8l46).\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t11. The ICRC, in a spirit of full understanding and co-operation, has acquainted Special Representative with the work of the ICRC representatives in the Near it area in so far as that work related to aspects of Security Council resolution 237 (1967) for which the ICRC traditionally takes direct responsibility, the basis of the Special Representative's direct observations in the Near East, Secretary-General wishes to express his great appreciation for the untiring and selfless efforts of these representatives in their difficult and delicate task, aimed at reducing human hardship and suffering wherever possible.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t12. The Special Representative has advised the Secretary-General that he received excellent co-operation from the representatives of the United Nations and other international organizations referred to above, particularly from UNRWA. This co-operation greatly assisted him in carrying out his task. The Special; Representative has also reported the great efforts being made in all the areas he visited by a large number of international and national voluntary agencies to provide humanitarian assistance to the civilian populations and to refugees uprooted because of the war and living often under miserable conditions in "temporary shelters, and not infrequently without any shelter at all. This combined effort of so many different organizations, which has greatly contributed to a reduction of the human suffering in the wake of the war, is much appreciated.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t13. The Secretary-General takes this opportunity to express his warm appreciation to Mr. Gussing, who has already served the United Nations with distinction on two previous occasions, and to his two collaborators, Mr. Hubert Morsink and Mr. Robert Prevot, for having gathered under trying circumstances the extensive information which constitutes the basis of this report. The Secretary-General also expresses his sincere thanks to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees for making Mr. Gussing's services available.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tII. SAFETY, WELFARE AND SECURITY OF THE POPULATION\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\tIN AREAS UNDER ISRAEL CONTROL\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tA. Syrian area<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t General situation<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t14. In south-western Syria an area of some 80 kilometres long and 35 kilometres, deep is at present under Israel military control. The original population, assumed to have been some 115,000 according to Syrian sources, and some 90,000 according to Israel sources, included 17,000 Palestinian refugees registered with UNRWA. At the time of the Special Representative's visit, this entire population had left the area, except for some 6,000 Druses living in agricultural villages and for some 250 other civilians living mainly in the town of Kuneitra,\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t15. In most of this area, villages were empty, without a human being or animal left. For instance, in the village of Kafr-Nafagk, composed of primitive houses built of black basalt stone, sometimes with a complement of concrete, which the mission visited, there was no sign of life. The town of Banias was in ruins and the near by archaeological site was undamaged and was attracting Israel tourists.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t16. In the main town of Kuneitra only a handful of local inhabitants were seen in the streets. Of an original population of 20 to 30,000, some 200 civilians, mostly old people and women and children, had remained, some of them carrying on 4: such activities as work for different military services, road repairs and town cleaning. The military authorities had regrouped these remaining inhabitants in the so-called Christian quarter of the city and had appointed from among them a Mukhtar (local government officer). The Israel authorities informed" the Special Representative that they provided the civilian population with the necessary day-to-day assistance. The Mukhtar told the Special Representative during a meeting which was also attended by an Israel officer that the civilian population was satisfied with their present treatment.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t17. Entirely different was the feeling of active life and peaceful existence in the Druse *<\/u>\/ villages. During the hostilities the Druse population of the occupied area had assembled in one village, and after the hostilities had ended they returned to their original villages. The Special Representative visited the prosperous fruit-growing Druse village of Majd-el-Shamsh. The villagers stated that the Druses had not wanted to leave their area because it had not been touched by military operations, because they did not want to lead the life of refugees, and also because in line with their religion and tradition they wished to keep their lands to safeguard their identity and dignity as a community. The Israel authorities had already made efforts to improve their living conditions by fulfilling requests for food and clothing, by setting up a medical clinic in the village, by resuming postal services, by introducing a telephone exchange and by promising assistance in food production and in the marketing of agricultural products.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t18. The entire occupied area had been placed under Israel military administration. The military authorities were assisted in their civilian tasks by representatives from various ministries, for instance those dealing with finance, road repairs and transport. The military governor of the area had a budget obtained from different ministries and in line with the specific projects envisaged. These projects were co-ordinated at a higher administrative level.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t19. In letters to United Nations bodies and in discussions with the Special Representative, officials of the Syrian Government listed numerous complaints regarding alleged violations of humanitarian principles by the Israel occupying forces: these complaints, which for the most part could not be investigated individually by the Special Representative, have not therefore been verified by him. They may be grouped into the following categories:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Atrocities committed by the Israel forces, such as the torture of civilians, killing of civilians after they had been forced to say that they were members of the Syrian army or because their sons were in the Syrian army, shooting of prisoners, execution of young men, in particular, those carrying the service-to-the-flag booklet;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(b) Capture of nationals suspected of having participated in the 1948 war, of innocent civilians in several villages – in particular, of men under thirty-five years of age in one village and of patients in another;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(c) Rape of women and young girls and assault and insult of religious dignitaries;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(d) Neglect of wounded and of children separated from their parents;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(e) Intimidation and frightening of the population by such acts as indiscriminate shooting, burning of fields and killing of people in front of other people;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(f) Efforts to expel the population from certain villages; deportation of all civilians who had once served in the army and of all able-bodied Syrian young men;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(g) Indiscriminate looting of all houses and shops in Runeitra; seizure of cattle and flocks of sheep. Looting, through excavation, of the historic site of Banias;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(h) Destruction of several villages with dynamite and bulldozers after the hostilities had ended. (Among the places mentioned are Banias, Jbeita-el-Zeit, Kfar-Harim and Nukheila.) The last such destruction allegedly took place on 13 July;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(i) Starvation of the population.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t20. It should be noted that the complaints grouped under categories (a) through (d) above refer essentially to situations which may have prevailed during the period of active hostilities or immediately thereafter, and therefore would have required detailed on-the-spot investigation for each particular case. Some of the complaints grouped under (e) through (i) refer more directly to events and situations which allegedly continue to occur up to the present day. In letters to United Nations bodies and in discussions with the Special Representative, officials of the Israel Government have rejected these allegations.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Civilian population in the occupied area<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t21. In order to assess the conditions relevant to the safety, security and welfare of the population, the Special Representative heard the views of a wide range of persons in both Syria and Israel, visited the refugees in their temporary shelters in Syria, and made a tour of the occupied area. During this tour, on 7 and 8 August the Special Representative was able to visit the towns of Runeitra and Banias, and to observe, on the spot or through field glasses, the present conditions of the Arab villages of Kafr-Nafagh, Nukheila, Kfar-Hareb, Tawfik-el-Foka and Skopia and of the Druse village of Majd-el-Shamsh.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t22. These field visits have enabled the Special Representative to gather a general of the situation now prevailing, to obtain an over-all perspective in viewing this situation, and to look into a number of selected issues affecting the and welfare of the population in the area during the period following the Ration of active hostilities. Several aspects of Israel policy in the occupied were looked into in more detail by the Special Representative during his visit. are the alleged systematic efforts to expel its entire original population the area; the alleged wide-scale looting and the alleged demolition of entire villages after the cessation of hostilities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Movement of population<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t23 Israel sources claimed that already around 6 June (at the beginning of the war before the Israel forces moved into Syrian territory) wealthy persons and officials had started leaving the area. Once active hostilities reached area, the population started moving out en masse<\/u>. With regard to this population movement, the Israel authorities put forward the view that as a result of widely publicized Syrian intentions concerning the fate of the civilian of Israel in the aftermath of an Arab victory, the Syrian civilian population feared a similar fate at the hands of the Israel forces. Israel spokesmen also claimed that the Syrian Government at that time had sent messages the local population not to fall under Israel control and to move out of area. However, no proof of this claim (e.g., records of monitored radio Broadcasts) was given. Some persons may have left for practical reasons such as the desire to retain the possibility of receiving pensions or remittances from Syria.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t24. While there were strong indications that the majority of the population had before the end of the hostilities, reports were conflicting (or, least, not really mutually supporting) as regards events after that period. The Special Representative found it difficult, in such circumstances, to the line between physical and psychological pressure. It is equally difficult to ascertain to what extent an occupying force is responsible for the responsible interpretation which a local population may put upon its actions. This issue to be viewed in the context of prevalent feelings of hate, apprehension and panic in the area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t26. Reports made available to the Special Representative indicate population felt frightened by Incidents such as shooting in the air, or the rounding up of civilians, or in one case by the staged repetition (without prior warning for the purpose of a film production) of how a city was occupied by the Israel As late as 29 August the Special Representative was informed by the Syrian Government that seven or eight persons who wished to remain in Kuneitra had been forced to leave that city and been expelled over the border. Allegedly the Israel Government had later agreed that these particular refugees should be allowed to return to Kuneitra.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t27. The Special Representative felt that it was likely that many such incidents taken place and that the Israel forces had not viewed unfavourably the impact of such incidents on the movement of population out of the area. At no point during discussions on this subject was the Special Representative ever informed of any action taken by the Israel authorities to reassure the population.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t28. Whatever the policy of the Israel Government may have been as regards the population, it seemed clear to the Special Representative that at the local level certain actions authorized or allowed by local military commanders were an important ft cause of their flight.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t29. There are indications that providing reassurance to the frightened population could have been of great importance. Officers of UNTSO informed the Special Representative that after the creation of United Nations Observation Posts people came back, closely following the movement of United Nations military personne. (On the Syrian side of the observation line the Syrian military command did not stop civilians from approaching the buffer zone and seems to allow them to return freely.) Furthermore, in spite of the fact that United Nations Observers had the population against working in the fields in the buffer zone, some individuals continued to try to do so, most probably feeling reassured by the United Nations presence.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t30. At the time of the Special Representative's visit, several persons, Syrian and non-Syrian, were held in detention in Kuneitra, including some Israel soldiers sentenced to imprisonment for looting. During his visit and in his presence, recently arrived team of the International Committee of the Red Cross obtained confirmation by the military governor of the permission for the ICRC to visit detainees in prison, who had already been visited by their predecessors. Since then Lebanese civilians among those detained in Kuneitra have been returned to their homes in connexion with the exchange of prisoners of war.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Looting<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t31. Although reports from Israel sources indicate that Kuneitra was taken without fighting, the Special Representative observed all over the city that nearly every shop and every house seemed to have been broken into and looted. A visit to one apartment building confirmed the thoroughness with which the looting had been done, and showed that in some cases dwellings had been set on fire after looting had occurred.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t32. Israel spokesmen did not deny the looting but pointed out that looting is often associated with warfare. They also claimed that the Syrian army had announced the capture of Kuneitra twenty-four hours before it was actually taken by the Israel forces and that this would have allowed the Syrian army to loot the town for this period of time.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t33. They pointed out that several divisions, both Syrian and Israel, as well as fleeing population from villages closer to the Israel border, had passed through the city of Kuneitra during and after the hostilities. However, on the strength of reports received from different sources, the Special Representative felt reasonably sure that the responsibility for this extensive looting of the town of Kuneitra lay to a great extent with the Israel forces, and he expressed this view to the Israel officials accompanying him during Ms tour of the city.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t34. Syrian authorities in their statements attached special importance to the looting in the occupied area and particularly in the historic site near the town of Banias. These statements, addressed to the United Nations, to UNESCO and to several embassies, persistently alleged "excavations" and "international robbery" of historic treasures. The Special Representative, during his extensive tour of the site, could find no trace of any recent digging in those parts of the site that were shown to him.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Demolition of villages<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t35. The Special Representative visited several of the villages mentioned in Syrian complaints which alleged destruction "by dynamite or bulldozers and implied premeditated demolition for non-military reasons. He visited the heavily damaged town of Banias. Pieces of heavy artillery visible among the ruins, and the detailed description by senior officers of the Israel forces of the route of military advance in the area, left him reasonably sure that the vast destruction had been caused mainly during actual fighting and to some extent after the fighting had ended by the military necessity of blowing up structures on the point of collapsing or which possibly still contained unexploded ammunition or mines.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t36. Because of mined roads, the Special Representative observed through field glasses the partly destroyed village of Kukheila, west of Banias. Its destruction could be explained by similar military reasons.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t37. In late August demolitions were reported In the village of Kafr El Maa, which lies within the buffer zone east of Lake Tiberias. South of the lake the Special Representative observed through field glasses the entirely destroyed village of Tawfik-el-Foka and the heavily damaged village of Kfar-Hareb. The two villages, which formed part of a chain of military fortifications, were located on a military advance route, and heavy fighting had allegedly taken place in both. It was pointed out to the Special Representative that the near by village of Skopia had not suffered damage, since it was not located on the route of the advance of the Israel military forces.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t38. To sum up on the question of the destruction or demolition of villages and towns, the Special Representative felt that the localities he observed, including three of the four persistently mentioned in Syrian complaints, did show vast destruction, but that this destruction could largely be attributed to military operations.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t39. In connexion with his tour of the occupied areas of Syria, the Special Representative also paid visits to the Israel frontier kibbutzim of Gadot, Lahavot Habashan and Tel-Katzir and the small locality of Ashmora, all of which were said to have been shelled during the war. He was informed by the Israel authorities that during the war over 1,000 shells fell in the kibbutz of Gadot alone.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t B. Jordanian area <\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t General situation<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t40. The area of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan now under Israel military control, which is bounded by the Israel-Jordan armistice demarcation line and the river Jordan, is commonly known as the West Bank. The population was approximately 600,000 to 700,000, including the Jordanian sector of Jerusalem, plus about 430,000 UNRWA registered refugees, or a total of about 1 million to 1.1 million persons. During and after the fighting an estimated 200,000 persons left for the East Bank. In addition, a substantial number of persons were displaced within the Bank area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t41. The West Bank area came under Israel military administration after the hostilities, while the Jordanian sector of Jerusalem and some surrounding areas were promptly incorporated in the Israel municipality of Jerusalem.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t42. Complaints by the Jordanian authorities relevant to the safety, welfare and security of the population of the West Bank could not all be investigated in detail or verified by the Special Representative. They can be grouped into the following categories:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Efforts to expel the population from the area;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(b) Acts of deliberate intimidation, terror and oppression of the population;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(c) Atrocities against civilian populations;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(d) Demolition of houses, buildings and entire villages after hostilities had ended;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(e) Looting;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(f) Use of napalm and fragmentary bombs during the fighting;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(g) Limitations and conditions put up by Israel and impeding the free return of all refugees;\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(h) Inhuman treatment of prisoners of war.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t43. Israel has either rejected these complaints as unfounded, or has put forward. Its views on them, particularly as regards demolition of villages.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t44. Before proceeding to the West Bank, the Special Representative paid a first visit to Amman on 18, 19 and 20 July. The discussions between the Jordanian Government and the Special Representative were almost entirely devoted to two problems of particular concern to the Government; namely, the provision of adequate relief to those persons who had fled to the East Bank as a consequence of the hostilities, and their return to the West Bank. In this connexion the Special Representative visited a number of refugee camps on the East Bank which were providing temporary shelter for the displaced persons.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t45. During several tours of the West Bank, the Special Representative visited towns of Nablus, Qalqiliya, Bethlehem and Hebron, as well as a number of villages and refugee camps. During these visits contact was made with the Israel military authorities and their advisers concerned with the restoration of normal civilian life, and also with Arab representatives of local government bodies and spokesmen for local economic interests, the Moslem religious authorities and the refugees.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Efforts to expel the population<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t 46. In letters circulated to the Security Council (e.g. S\/7975, <\/span>S\/8004<\/a>, S\/8110, <\/span>S\/8115 and S\/8ll7), Jordan complains in general terms about Israel attempts to create "yet another Arab exodus", and in precise detail about the expulsion of specific numbers of inhabitants and about intimidation of the population, for example, by dynamiting houses in Nablus.<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t47. These complaints raise two distinct but related issues: the alleged Israel attempts to create another exodus to the East Bank, affecting the whole West Bank population, and the expulsion of populations from specific localities on the West Bank (which were subsequently demolished), whether or not the populations involved in fact moved to the East Bank.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t48. On the first issue, affecting the West Bank as a whole, the Special Representative finds difficulty in defining what constitutes "expulsion" or "use of force" in relation to the movement of populations. During his visit to the area, the Special Representative received no specific reports indicating that persons been physically forced to cross to the East Bank. On the other hand, there are persistent reports of acts of intimidation by Israel armed forces and of Israel attempts to suggest to the population, by loudspeakers mounted on cars, that they, might be better off on the East Bank. There have also been reports that in sever localities buses and trucks were put at the disposal of the population for to the East Bank.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t49. During his visits to several refugee camps on the East Bank, newly displaced persons consistently informed the Special Representative that they had left the West Bank under pressure and that they had suffered many atrocities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t50. The truth seems to lie somewhere between an Israel statement that "no encouragement" was given to the population to flee, and the allegations about the use of brutal force and intimidation made by refugees. The inevitable impact upon a frightened civilian population of hostilities and military occupation as such, particularly when no measures of reassurance are taken, has clearly been a main factor in the exodus from the West Bank.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Demolition of villages<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t51. More specific details are available concerning the second category of persons displaced by Israel military forces in connexion with the demolition of certain villages and towns. Jordanian complaints submitted to the Security Council claim that 12,000 people from Qalqiliya were living in the open air around 22 June, that the villages of Beit Awa and Beit Mersim as well as three villages in the Latrun area had been levelled,1 leaving 5,000 to 7,000 inhabitants homeless. The Special Representative has been able to gather information covering those and Other localities mentioned in other Jordanian complaints submitted directly to him.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Qalqiliya<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t52. Qalqiliya was a town of some 13,000 to 14,000 inhabitants located west of the city of Nablus and near the Jordan\/Israel border where a large number of houses have been destroyed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t53. Israel, in a letter to the Security Council (S\/8013), mentions that Qalqiliya was one of the concentration points of the Jordanian general attack on Israel and that large numbers of troops and artillery pieces were located in and around the town from which shelling of Tel Aviv and Israel villages took place. The letter states that the inhabitants left before the arrival of the Israel troops, that only houses in which Jordanian troops were found were damaged and that since the end of the battle no further buildings had been destroyed. In support of the statement that destruction had been caused by actual fighting, reference is made in the Israel statement to the nearby town of Tulkarm where allegedly no damage was done since no fighting took place there.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t54. During a visit by the Assistant to the Special Representative, the Arab Mayor of Qalqiliya stated that most of the people had left the city and taken cover in the hills before and during the fighting and that about one quarter of the population had remained in the city. After the occupation of the city by the Israel forces, the remaining population was advised by the Israel Military Commander to leave. The Mayor asserted that up to that moment, perhaps some fifteen to twenty houses had been destroyed or damaged through actual fighting. The population was taken to the town of Azun, twenty kilometres from Qalqiliya; from Azun they left for Nablus, where they stayed for about three days, when they were told they could go back. But when they were going back they were stopped in Azun. The Mayor requested and was allowed to see the Minister of Defence in Jerusalem; three weeks after they left their city, the population was allowed to go back to Qalqiliya. Upon their return they found that out of a total of some 2,000 dwellings approximately 850 had been demolished. The Mayor repeatedly stated that he did not know the reasons for this large-scale destruction.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t55. The Israel military governor stated that the destruction had been caused partly by tanks and partly by dynamite. He stressed that Qalqiliya "fought", by which it was meant that there was general resistance to the Israel military forces, and that it was the first Jordanian town taken. Houses from which sniping took place were dynamited. Others were destroyed for "safety" reasons, e.g. houses on the point of collapsing and possibly containing unexploded ammunition, or for sanitary reasons, e.g. because of the presence of dead bodies. Fear of the possible collapse of houses was also given by the military governor as a reason why the population was not allowed to return for some time.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t56. The military governor said that he was willing to support the population in their plans for reconstruction and that he had already taken measures to get food supplies to the city and to get shops opened again.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t57. The city was heavily guarded by Israel military personnel and no signs of friendly contact between local inhabitants and the occupying forces were observed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Villages in the Latrun area<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t58. In the Latrun area are located the border-line villages of Emwas, Yalu and Beit Nuba, together containing a population of some 4,000 according to Israel information, and 10,000 according to information from the refugees. In the same area are located the villages of Beit Likquia, Beit Sira and Beni Hareth, with an estimated total population of 3,300. The first three villages mentioned have been destroyed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t59. An Israel liaison officer stated that the destruction had taken place mostly during the fighting, that the Jordanian Army in the area had been assisted by one battalion of Egyptian commandos, that the area had been heavily shelled, that fighting had gone on all through the night and that tanks had gone through the villages because these are located on the way from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t60. The Israel Minister of Defence, in his meeting with the Special Representative, stated that he had ordered the destruction of these damaged villages for strategic and security reasons since they dominated an important strategic area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tRepresentative, the State of Israel had informed the representatives of these three villages that it would help their population "to develop other areas".\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t62. According to accounts from displaced persons, the Israel forces entered the . three villages of Emwas, Yalu and Beit Nuba at 4.30 a.m. on 6 June and called the inhabitants to assemble, after which they were ordered under threat to leave in the direction of Ramallah. They were joined on the road by people from the "second line" villages of Beit Likquia, Beit Sira and Beni Hareth. After three days they were told that they could go back but they were allowed to reach the "second line" villages only. Those who wanted to go on to Emwas, Yalu and Beit Nuba were turned They then returned to Ramallah and some of them went to the East Bank.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t63. According to the same sources, those who stayed behind in and around Ramallah In the "second line" villages persisted in their demands to the Israel Commander that they should be allowed to return to their homes. After two days, the Commander of the Latrun area came to Ramallah and met with representatives of the displaced villagers, who were informed that 70 per cent of their houses had been 5 destroyed but that arrangements for their return could be made if they so desired. They were also told that there was a need for their labour in order to cultivate the extensive monastery lands in the Latrun area. The representatives of the villagers replied that their people wanted to go back, even though their houses had been destroyed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t64. According to the information available to the Special Representative, however, these displaced villagers had not yet been able to return. They felt encouraged, apparently, by the Israel decision to allow the people of Qalqiliya to return.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t65. As regards the "second line" villages, to which the population has now been allowed to return, the situation can be summarized as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) At Beit Likquia out of a pre-war population of about 2,000, including fifty UNRWA refugees, 300 had left for unknown destinations (probably the East Bank). Five hundred had come from the above-mentioned frontier villages; these people, who were living in houses, schools or under trees, wanted to go back. The food situation was under control, although there was a slight shortage of water.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(b) At Beit Sira, where there was a pre-war population of 1,250, about had remained. Two hundred and fifty additional persons had come from the three above-mentioned villages.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(c) No information was available as regards Beni Hareth, which consisted of a few houses only. Both UKRWA and the Lutheran World Federation were providing emergency relief to the populations now living in these "second line" villages.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t66. At Beit Awa in the Hebron area (original population some 2,500 persons), out of some 400 houses, more than 90 per cent have been completely demolished and the remainder partly damaged. A second village in the area, Beit Mersim (original population approximately 500), was completely destroyed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t67. The Special Representative visited Beit Awa on 11 August. The Arab stated that Israel troops entered the village on 11 June at 5.30 a.m. The inhabitants were then asked to take two loaves of bread and to go to the hills surrounding the village. At 7.30 a.m. the Israel troops started to demolish houses with dynamite and bulldozers. Groves around the village were burnt. The belongings of the inhabitants were also burnt since they were unable to take them along. The population stayed in the hills for a week. They were then authorized to return by the military governor. Cut of the original population of 2,500, some 300 had left for other areas.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t68. The Mukhtar said he presumed that the reason for the demolition was that the Israel authorities believed that there were members of the "El Patah" organization coming from the village. He claimed that members of this organization used to pass through the village but did not live in it and that the inhabitants never co-operated with them. In this connexion, the Israel authorities informed the Special Representative that this village was an "El Fatah" base where members of this terrorist organization used to stay overnight and where they received ammunition and supplies.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t69. The Israel military liaison officer informed the Special Representative that a decision had been made to rebuild the village but that it had not yet been decided whether this would be done by the Government alone or with the help of voluntary organizations. In principle, he said that the Israel authorities were going to supply technicians and provide cement to help in the rebuilding of the houses. The Mukhtar said that the Israel authorities had promised them all this, but that so far nothing had been received.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t70. In Beit Mersim, located fifteen kilometres from Beit Awa, a similar situation prevailed, according to the Mukhtar of Beit Awa.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t71. Some other villages where destruction had allegedly taken place were Beit Illo (near Ramallah), Kharas, Sourif and Edna. According to the Israel military liaison officer, only the village of Beit Illo had suffered some war damage, while the villages of Kharas and Edna had not been touched. According to one of the villagers of Beit Awa, eighteen houses had been demolished in Sourif.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Number of homeless persons<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t72. As regards the number of people from the town of Qalqiliya and from the villages located in the Latrun and Hebron areas, rendered homeless for a shorter or longer period, the situation can be summarized as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) In the Latrun area at least 4,000 persons from the front line villages of Emwas, Yalu and Beit Nuba had not yet been allowed to return to their villages. About 3,300 persons from the "second line" villages of Beit Sira, Belt Ltkquia and Beni Hareth had been allowed to return.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(b) In the Hebron area 3,000 persons had been allowed to return to Beit Awa and Beit Mersim.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(c) Qalqiliya. According to the Arab Mayor, about one quarter of the total population of approximately 14,000 stayed in the town during the hostilities. Thus a maximum of some 4,000 persons might have remained and teen ordered out by the Israel military authorities after actual fighting had ended. Houses destroyed belonged both to this group and to the persons who left before complete, or partial destruction of the 40 to 50 per cent of the housing had taken place. The populations had been allowed to return, but it was not known how many actually did return.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Looting<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t73. There are Jordanian complaints about alleged looting "of everything" found , in banks by Israel occupying forces. This allegation has been rejected by Israel as "unfounded". During his tour of the area, the Special Representative was informed by Israel spokesmen that in fact Israel had taken away the bank books and money found in the banks, but against duly signed receipts and for the sole purpose of making a systematic check on the situation of these banks at the time Israel took over control of the area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t74. Jordanian complaints also allege looting of commercial stores, houses, the hospital in Nablus and the theft of church jewellery from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. According to press reports, the latter items had been found and restored. The Special Representative received the specific Jordanian complaints about looting only after his visit to the areas concerned and was therefore unable to look into the alleged looting of the Nablus hospital.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t75. The Special Representative also received reports concerning looting in Jerusalem by Israel military personnel, including cars, vacant houses and shops. Since the alleged events took place, some two months before the arrival of the Special Representative, it was difficult for him to form a firm opinion about these allegations.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t76. The Assistant to the Special Representative, during his visit to the hospital of Qalqiliya, was informed by the doctor in charge that the X-ray machine, the Operating table, overhead lights and other equipment in the operating theatre, as well as stocks of hospital linen had disappeared. Israel officers present during the tour of the hospital stated that the Israel authorities had promised to provide the hospital with a new operating theatre.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t77. Israel spokesmen informed the Special Representative on several occasions that the Israel authorities had taken measures to prevent looting and to stop it when it occurred, including the court marshalling of army personnel caught in the act of looting.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Economic and social conditions and needs<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t78. Views on the economic and social conditions of the civilian population on the West Bank were conflicting. According to statements by spokesmen of the Jordanian Government, the economy of the area was paralysed, there was a threatened shortage of food approaching a situation of famine for the population, there was no circulation of money owing to the confiscation by occupying forces of cash on hand in the Jordanian banks which were closed for business by these forces, and moreover, confiscation of property has taken place. The Jordanian; views of the situation are presented in more detail in statements presented by the Jordanian Government to the Special Representative. These statements are attache as annexes to this report (see annexes II to IV).\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t79. The Israel views on the situation, set forth in statements also attached as annexes to this report, stress the speedy return of normal life in the occupied area and the measures taken by the Israel Government to facilitate and encourage, this process in relation to local government, currency problems, price level, employment, the reactivation of agriculture, industry and commerce, the re-establishment of basic services such as electricity, water, communications and transportation, and the resumption of services in the fields of health, education welfare and religious and judicial life.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t80. The Special Representative was not able, in the time at his disposal, to assess completely the social and economic situation prevailing on the West to establish a complete review of measures taken by the Israel Government, and less to analyse all the implications of Israel measures taken so far. He has been able, however, to obtain an impression on these points by direct observation during his visits to the main West-Bank towns of Hebron, Bethlehem, Nablus and Qalqiliya, and through detailed and specific discussions with representatives of the local population and of the Israel authorities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t81. The information gathered in this way is presented here classified to main items relevant to the situation prevailing in each of the four towns. Since these situations differ, not all subjects are covered for each town. Secondly, because of the variations in the time at the disposal of the Special Representative in each town and the differences in background and knowledge the spokesmen consulted, the information is more complete on some subjects for some towns than for others.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Qalqiliya<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t82. The information concerning Qalqiliya, which was visited by the Assistant, to the Special Representative on 12 August 1967, was as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Local government<\/u>. The Arab Mayor stated that the employees of the municipality had returned to work and that the municipality had received 4,000 pounds from the Jordanian Government and 3,000 pounds from the Israel Government and that he was expecting more funds from the Israel Government. He stated that it was necessary to strengthen the budget of the municipality to carry out the reconstruction of this largely destroyed city. Moreover, additional funds would be required once the agricultural season began. So far, he said, no plans had been made regarding reconstruction, but a budget had been submitted to the Israel authorities. The legal adviser to the Israel military governor stated that in a few days the municipality would receive long-term loans to help the shopkeepers to start buying goods. According to the Mayor, the main problems facing the city were the financing of the budget and the general shortage of money.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(b) Banks <\/u>There were no branches of Israel banks in the area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(c) Basic amenities<\/u>. The Mayor stated that the Israel Government had helped in restoring of the water and electricity systems.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(d) Food<\/u>. Food was provided by UNRWA. For the first month UNRWA supplied food to everyone; as from the second month, no rations were issued to those who had their own means.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(e) Shelter<\/u>. Some of those whose houses were destroyed are at present living with relatives or outside Qalqiliya (in Nablus, for instance) or in their former houses in Qalqiliya, where they had covered the destroyed parts with tents. About 200 tents were distributed by the Israel Government and about 30 by UNRWA. The tents provided by the Israel Government were cut into pieces and shared by several families in order to cover damaged parts of their houses. The Mayor stated that there were no official plans to reconstruct the town but that he had read in newspapers that the Israel Government intended to carry out the reconstruction.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(f) Education<\/u>. The Mayor stated that the schools would be functioning. He had heard of teachers elsewhere who had been asked to fill in a special form before resuming their work, but this had not happened in Qalqiliya.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(g) Health services.<\/u> The Mayor stated that when the population returned to Qalqiliya there were a number of human and animal remains in many places; the Health Department proceeded to their removal and to a disinfection campaign. A medical doctor was now visiting the city twice a week, but the Mayor considered the present health services inadequate. He would prefer that the doctor be permanently stationed in Qalqiliya. The UNRWA hospital was still functioning, but without its previous operating theatre, as stated elsewhere in this report.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(h) Economy<\/u>. The main source of livelihood for the 12,500 non-UNRWA residents was agriculture and remittances of money from those who emigrated to other countries. Agriculture was being resumed since no fields were destroyed. However, there was a problem of unemployment. Through the Israel Government about 120 workers were now working on cleaning the town.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(i) Confiscations<\/u>. The Mayor stated that no goods or properties had been confiscated in Qalqiliya.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Nablus<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t83. The information regarding Nablus, visited on 24 July, may be summarized as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Curfew<\/u>. There was a curfew throughout the area from 7 p.m to 4 a.m., when farmers start going to their work.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(b) Municipality<\/u>. An Israel spokesman said that the Israel military authorities had authorized the head of the municipality to run the services himself and that they had given him the practical possibilities to do so by providing supplies and assistance. The Mayor was the elected Arab Mayor of the city who did not leave the city during the hostilities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(c) Police<\/u>. The police force was operating and consisted of about eighty-five policemen in Nablus only. Those who were found were all remobilized and back on duty. They were wearing uniforms, and the Israel authorities had supplied them with weapons to safeguard the town against looting.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(d) Employment of government officials.<\/u> According to an Israel official, there were 1,300 teachers in the district of Nablus. All of them would receive their salaries. Moreover, salaries were also being paid to policemen, to the staff of government hospitals, and to the personnel of post offices. In principle, all officers working for the administration would be paid. The Israel official stated that already some 350 workers were working in the projects of the municipality, such as construction of municipal roads and new buildings. the Arab Mayor stated that even though the present Government was paying most of the teachers, unfortunately most of the other departments had not yet received pay money, from either the Jordanian or the Israel Government. This situation, in his opinion, affected "thousands of people", many of whom were coming to see him daily about their problems. He mentioned in this connexion the Department of Land Registry, the religious courts, the pension office, the civil law courts, which were located in Nablus and served the wider Nablus district. The Israel spokesman stated that the Israel authorities did not know about the existence of these offices and their specific tasks. According to their information, there were about twenty-one government departments in Nablus, and payment of salaries to their officer was now beginning, except for some civil servants who were felt by the Israel authorities to be redundant.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(e) Banks<\/u>. According to an Israel official, the banks were functioning.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(f) Basic public facilities. An Israel spokesman said that the electricity supply had not been interrupted; postal and telephone services were operating.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(g) Water<\/u>. According to an Israel spokesman, the water pipeline was blown up during the fighting and was being renewed. In midsummer it was usually dry in Nablus, and the city needed water from outside.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(h) Food<\/u>. An Israel spokesman said that the Israel authorities supplied the most essential things which were not in stock in sufficient quantity in Nablus, such as flour. In some villages around Nablus there was no flour either. The Israel military authorities told the village Mukhtars that they could bring their problems before the municipality in the areas in which their villages were located, and through the Mayors the population had been supplied with flour. There was no problem of starvation whatsoever. The Arab Mayor stated that there was enough food but the population lacked the money to buy it and that the municipality had started to give help to about 16,000 people in Nablus city alone (but of a total population of 75,000 to 80,000).\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(i) Health<\/u>. According to an Israel spokesman, hospitals were operating. The Israel authorities gave the head of the municipality the power to run the services in town, including the health services. The Arab Mayor stated that medical services were working, but not as they used to. Some of the personnel the clinics and some of the manual workers had left, some of the instruments been lost, and there was not as much transport as was needed. Moreover, apart the traditional medical services, there were some special projects, such as a malaria eradication project and a tuberculosis centre and a maternity and child health programme, all of which had come to a standstill. The Arab Mayor stated that the municipality had discussed these problems with the Israel authorities who showed "an eagerness to co-operate" and that weekly meetings had been with the health authorities in Jerusalem.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(j) Agriculture<\/u>. According to an Arab spokesman (formerly Minister of Agriculture in the Jordanian Government), at least 50 per cent of the harvest in the Nablus area was destroyed during the war. However, an Israel agricultural specialist felt sure that more than 80 per cent of the crops of the area had saved. After hostilities ended, the Israelis had proceeded to the harvesting abandoned crops; in the case of wheat, to prevent it from burning out; in the case of tomatoes and melons, to avoid rotting. Surplus perishable agricultural products had been sent to Israel canning factories. He stated that the Israeli authorities had assisted local agriculture, first, by doing this emergency harvesting, sometimes using machines brought in from Israel, and secondly, by assisting in the sale of agricultural surpluses to industries in Israel now the usual export outlets to countries like Kuwait had been closed. In addition the authorities would be willing to supply seeds for the new agricultural Arab spokesmen stressed the difficulty of resuming agricultural activities of the great number of people who had left for the East Bank. Difficulties soon be felt when the olives had to be picked. They felt that the reduced la force would lead to a reduction of agricultural production which would a shortage of food in the area. The Israel agricultural spokesman said that the Israel authorities had started to prepare plans for the next agricultural season and felt sure that they would be able to plant all the areas where no war damage had been done. He was surprised to hear that there was so much concern about the alleged shortage of agricultural labour.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(k) Commerce<\/u>. All marketing had been arranged as from the first week after the war, according to an Israel spokesman. During the war the Israel military authorities stopped all traffic. The day after the war traffic resumed with private cars. Commodities which were lacking were brought in from Israel. The Israel authorities arranged for the sale of manufactured products from Nablus in the Arab part of Jerusalem. However, the Arab Mayor stated: "The commercial situation is a little better but is not what it should be."\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(1) Shops<\/u>. An Israel spokesman said that shops were open; everything was as before. A few of the shopkeepers had left, and some others kept their shops closed. Some travel agencies had closed down because they had no business. He stated: "We give all the opportunities, but it is up to the municipality." He drew attention to the fact that much tourist trade was now coming from Israel. The Arab Mayor stated that a large number of shops had opened and that a large number Of Israelis had started to come to the area and were buying; but apart from these visitors, there were no tourists of the usual kind.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(m) Price level<\/u>. According to an Israel spokesman, prices generally were going up, but compared with Israel prices in Nablus were lower as the local standard of living was lower.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(n) Unemployment situation<\/u>. The Arab Mayor indicated that there was a problem of unemployment affecting a large number of labourers. This was unusual as, before the war, there had been no unemployment during the summer season but only in winter. He declared that unemployment was felt in all sectors of the economy and gave as examples both private and public building and, related to this, unemployment in many industries, such as ironwork and furniture, in which a large number of labourers worked. Unemployment was also found, for example, in dressmaking, he Observed. According to an Israel official, soap factories in Nablus were resuming work gradually and would again provide employment to about a hundred workers.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(o) Unemployment relief<\/u>. An Israel official said that efforts were being made to relieve unemployment in the area, especially through the initiation of public works. Many roads were being repaired, and there were plans to enlarge other roads. These works were expected to absorb hundreds of labourers. Moreover, the military authorities had asked the municipality to operate projects which had been planned before the war. If the municipality needed money to start the projects, the Israel Government would be ready to give it and had in fact already done so to some extent. Many people were working on these projects, which included the reconstruction of the pipeline, road construction and road repair, and the continuation of construction work on schools, hospitals and other public buildings.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(p) Looting<\/u>. An Israel official said that there had been complaints about the looting of shops at night. The Israel defence forces had been able to catch the looters, who had been tried before a military court, since breaking the curfew and looting were military offences.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Bethlehem<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t84. The information concerning Bethlehem, which was visited on 11 August, was as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Municipality<\/u>. The Mayor of Bethlehem informed the Special Representative that the services of the municipality were running 100 per cent. Some projects were being carried out with the help of the Israel Government. Salaries for the month of June had been paid. As regards July salaries the Mayor had roughly half of the amount required available for payment. Approval of the budget was expected for August and September. As soon as the budget was approved, work could be given to another 155 municipal workers.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(b) Banks<\/u>. He stated that all money was frozen in the banks and that there was no liquidity. Only one Israel bank had opened, with very limited transactions. The Mayor had been informed that efforts were being made to obtain funds from London to reopen the Ottoman and British banks in Bethlehem, which were still closed.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(c) Food<\/u>. Immediately following the end of hostilities, there had been a shortage of flour, but new supplies had arrived within a few days. There were no food problems.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(d) Education<\/u>. The Arab Mayor asserted that schools would be opening in September. Most of the teachers were from the area.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(e) Health<\/u>. The Arab Mayor remarked that the health situation was good and that hospitals were working.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(f) Courts<\/u>. There were no problems, according to the Arab Mayor.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(g) Economy<\/u>. Bethlehem's main source of income was tourism, but foreign tourists had stopped coming. The head of the department of tourism in Jerusalem had promised to give the fullest attention to this point. The Israel military governor stated that Bethlehem could not exist without tourism coming through Israel and that therefore it was in the economic interest of the local population to co-operate with the Israel authorities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(h) Employment<\/u>. The Arab Mayor stated that there were some "jobless" but that road construction works were going on. However, construction on the Bethlehem-Jerusalem road, involving some forty to sixty employees, had been interrupted because the contractor had disappeared.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(i) Movement of population.<\/u> According to the Arab Mayor, there were three camps of Palestinian refugees in the area, with a total refugee population of some 20,000. About 3O per cent of them had left. Very few of the local residents of the Bethlehem area had left, however.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Hebron<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t85. As regards Hebron, which was also visited by the Special Representative on 11 August, the information received by him may be summarized as follows:\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Municipality<\/u>. The Arab Mayor informed the Special Representative that the officials who originally were working with the Government had all been re-employed except for about 20 per cent who had to be terminated upon the request of the Israel authorities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(b) Food<\/u>. Immediately after the war, basic commodities had been gathered together, and the municipality, together with the chamber of commerce, had carried out an inventory of stocks. The Israel authorities had supplied flour and fuel, of which there was a shortage.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(c) Education<\/u>. Schools would reopen on 1 September. Some teachers, mainly those who had been recruited from outside the area, had left. The places of teachers who did not return would be filled by university students.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t Economy<\/u>. The main economic activity in the region was fruit-growing. The Mayor observed that at present it was not possible to export fruit to the Bank, and that, moreover, it was not possible to send trucks to the Jericho area or the West Bank. Secondly, a large number of people from the area used to work in.^ the Arab peninsula and to send money home or to come to Hebron themselves for holidays and thus spend their earnings but they were no longer doing so.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(e) Commerce<\/u>. He stated that except for the absence of imports, commerce was going on normally. Before the war a large number of merchants had; through Amman for all sorts of goods which were now waiting in the port of and the merchants were now unable to bring these goods to Hebron. During his subsequent visit to Amman, the Special Representative took this matter up with the authorities there, who informed him of their willingness to seek a satisfactory arrangement for the merchants concerned.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(f) Employment<\/u>. From the point of view of manpower and employment, there, were no difficulties in the agricultural sector nor in other sectors of the economy, where work and life were continuing normally.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(g) Confiscations<\/u>. The Israel custodian of absentees' property had the houses of those who were away since the houses were empty. However, in cases the inhabitants were only temporarily away on a visit to Amman. In other cases, when a relative of the owner had been present but not the owner himself, the property had still been considered as absentee property by the Israel authorities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(h) Abraham's Tomb<\/u>. The Mufti informed the Special Representative that, Moslems had at first been forbidden to go and pray in the main mosque, built –over Abraham's Tomb. They had protested, and the Israel Minister of Defence had to discuss the matter directly with them. It had been agreed that the Moslems conduct their prayers at certain hours, while other hours would be reserved for visitors. An Israel officer explained that the difference of opinion arose from the fact that the shrine of Abraham's Tomb is equally holy to Moslems and Jews. The latter were now allowed to pass through the mosque.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t(i) Moslem religious courts.<\/u> The Mufti also declared that the main chiefs of the Islamic community had met and decided to appoint one of their member to, represent them in Jerusalem and deal with the Israel authorities. Any relevant Israel orders were now received through this representative. No difficulty had been encountered in carrying on the normal Moslem legislation and court affairs. (j) Movement of population<\/u>. The Mayor mentioned that before the entry of the Israel troops, an agreement had been reached that no fighting would take place in this area, and that in fact no fighting had taken place. Yet when the Arab Legion withdrew from the area, people began to flee. Approximately 15,000 to 18,000 out of a population of 150,000 in the area had left. The majority had left before the arrival of the Israel troops; come were still leaving. They had left of their own free will without any pressure from the army. Many had come back, and about 90 per cent of all those who had gone would like to come back. The army treated the population well. There were about 50,000 Palestinian refugees in the area, out of whom approximately 10,000 left. (Forty per cent of the refugees lived in camps.)\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t86. The above data from various sources seem to indicate that as a result of the hostilities the general economy of the West Bank came to a standstill. Trade between the West Bank and the East Bank was suspended; banks were closed, and credit facilities had been withdrawn. Many businesses were closed, and employees no longer received their salaries. The general impression was that food had soon become available, but not the money to buy it. The three major problems facing the economy were lack of liquidity, unemployment, and changing price levels.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t87. The Israel Government assured the Special Representative that it had taken initial measures to restart the West Bank economy, including the purchase of West Bank agricultural surpluses formerly exported to East Jordan and to other Arab countries, to re-employ former Jordanian Government and municipal employees, including teachers, as well as to create employment by public work projects, and to authorize some Jordanian banks to reopen and create branches of the Bank of Israel in the principal West Bank centres.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t88. An economist, a member of the Israel planning committee for the development of areas under Israel control, stated that at the beginning the idea had been to do whatever Israel could do to maintain the existing price levels in the occupied area. However, it was found that it would be impossible to operate separate customs controls for the West Bank and for the Gaza area and that in general it would be physically impossible for Israel to ensure a complete separation between the economies of the three areas. Therefore, at a later stage, a more flexible policy vas adopted accepting the idea that in principle there would have to be an adjustment of the level of prices between Israel and the occupied areas. Thinking then focused on measures to ensure a gradual adjustment so that the shock would not be too great. Such a gradual adjustment would be obtained by ensuring an effective rise in salaries and in the purchasing capacity of the population, in order to nullify the negative effect of the rise in price levels. In this connexion it was found that opening the area for Israel tourists would allow the population to sell whatever they had to sell, which in turn would increase their purchasing power.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t89. According to the same spokesman, a representative of the Israel National Bank went to discuss the rate of exchange of the Jordan dinar with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Fund had reservations regarding Israel's rate of exchange for the dinar. Israel informed the IMF of its readiness to modify the rate of exchange, provided that the convertibility of the dinar would be guaranteed for the future. Moreover, Israel was willing to let the local Arab banks resume business if the Jordanian banks transferred back all the balances being held in Amman. The IMF discussed this with the Jordanian authorities. These authorities drew up a list of proposals which, Israel felt, amounted to putting Israel in a situation where the economy of the West Bank would be run from Amman. Therefore, Israel decided, as a unilateral act, to raise the rate of exchange of the Jordan dinar (and of the Egyptian pound) in order to counter-balance the negative effect on the purchasing power.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t90. According to the same spokesman, Israel wanted to secure facilities for the transfer of remittances to the population; Israel felt that too much talk about this subject could bring about a situation where some Arab countries would not transfer money to their families in the occupied areas. Therefore, the IMF, the Red Cross and the United Nations were informed of the factual situation, namely, that Israel would see that any remittances transferred to persons in those areas would be made out to them through the banks. The banks were given orders to transfer any remittances which they received directly or indirectly for or on behalf of residents.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t91. According to the data provided by the Israel authorities, little damage was done in agricultural areas, and agriculture as an economic activity was functioning fairly well in most areas, with the possible exception of the Nablus region. Israel set up a group composed of various experts attached to the Prime Minister to look into plans for water resources and agricultural development. The immediate problem was, however, what to plan for the next agricultural season. For the moment there were surpluses, and Israel was faced with the problem of what to do with them. Israel policy aimed, according to Israel sources, at maintaining the economic activity at its previous level, but it was not to be expected that next season's agricultural production could be exported to the East Bank. Instead, the Israel market would have to be used as a basis for planning of West Bank agriculture. Agriculturists from the West Bank had already been taken on visits, to Israel to show them the situation and orientation of agriculture there, in order to help them make adjustments in their own plans for the next season. The Special Representative was informed that whatever the future of the West Bank would be, it was the earnest wish of Israel Cabinet Ministers responsible that the West Bank population should be able to conclude that the Israel administration had done whatever it could to raise the standards of living of the population.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t92. The Special Representative considered that, if there should be a delay in the resumption of normal economic life both on the West Bank and in the Gaza strip, a considerable portion of the population in these areas would suffer a decline in living standards and that nutritional problems might develop. Under these conditions, there would be a continued need to provide food relief for those persons who were not at present under UNRWA's care. Early consideration would therefore have to be given to the continuation or the expansion of existing feeding programmes, such as those that were being discussed between the Israel Government and CARE. Discussions were also taking place between UNICEF and the Israel authorities on this subject.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\tC. The United Arab Republic and areas administered <\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\t\t by the United Arab Republic<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t General situation<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t93. There are striking differences in population density and composition as well as in economic and social life between the United Arab Republic-administered Gaza strip and Sinai. The Gaza strip is a small but densely populated area with a total pre-war population estimated at about 455,000, of whom 315,000 or about 70 per cent, were UNRWA registered refugees. Sinai is a vast peninsula still characterized in the interior by the traditional Bedouin way of life. The settled population in this peninsula is largely concentrated in the town of El-Arish on the Mediterranean coast and in the eastern part of the town of Kantara on the East Bank of the Suez Canal. According to local Arab sources, the pre-war population of El-Arish was, estimated at between 30,000 and 40,000 and that of East Kantara at about 15,000.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t94. Prior to his visit to these areas the Special Representative proceeded to Cairo; on 27 July for discussions with representatives of the United Arab Republic Government. These discussions highlighted three issues to which the United Arab Republic attached particular importance: the alleged shortage of food and the starvation of the population in El-Arish, the shortage of water in East Kantara and the responsibility of the occupying authority for this state of affairs, and finally, the alleged expulsion of Palestinians across the Suez Canal by the Israel forces. Arrangements were made for the Special Representative to visit newly displaced persons who had been given temporary shelter in recently constructed villages in the land reclamation projects of the Liberation Province north west of Cairo. A visit to Israel prisoners of war held in the United Arab Republic was also arranged at the request of the Special Representative.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t95. The Special Representative visited El-Arish and East Kantara on 14 August Gaza town and its surrounding areas on the next day. In each locality meetings held with the Israel military forces in charge of the administration as well as representatives of Arab local government bodies and other spokesmen for the local Arab population and for Palestinian refugees.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t96.The Israel authorities submitted to the Special Representative two aide-memoires on the situation in the Gaza strip and northern Sinai, which are annexed to this report (see annexes VIII and IX).\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t Gaza<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t97. Besides considering the alleged expulsion of Palestinians from the Gaza strip, the Special Representative gave attention during his short visit to the area to a number of questions affecting the safety, welfare and security of the population. 98. The information obtained by the Special Representative is set forth below according to subjects. In this connexion it should be pointed out that because UNRWA registered refugees made up 70 per cent of the total population, UNRWA played an essential role in the economic and social life in the area which affected not only the refugees but also the population as a whole.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t(a) Movement of population<\/u>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t99. Until recently the population living in the Gaza area could be divided into three categories: the original Gaza population which had inhabited the area for centuries; Palestinian refugees and persons of Egyptian origin, mostly government civil servants, teachers, and professional persons.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t100. The Israel military commander of the Gaza area stated that there were still some 200 Egyptian civil servants in Gaza together with their families, who wanted to return to the United Arab Republic. He declared that they did not want to work in Gaza now since if they did so, they would lose their job potential in the United Arab Republic. However, if they stayed in the area under Israel control, they would have to work. According to other sources some 600 or 700 persons were imprisoned initially. Of these the Israel authorities later retained only men between eighteen and fifty-five years of age and allowed the others to leave for the United Arab Republic. The men between the ages of eighteen and fifty-five , were then transferred to El-Arish. The Special Representative had the opportunity to visit 289 United Arab Republic officials detained in El-Arish.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t101. Some sources claimed that after the hostilities ended in the Gaza area, Israel military forces rounded up about 3,000 persons who were thought to be members of the Palestine Liberation Army, and subsequently took them to places outside the Gaza strip. During his visit to the prisoner-of-war camp in Athlit (Israel) the Special Representative was informed that some of these Palestinians were detained there. According to various sources, others were taken to Kantara. There they were authorized by the Israel authorities to cross to the west side of the Suez Canal.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t102. The Special Representative had not been able to find official confirmation of the above-mentioned figure of 3,000 persons involved, or to determine how many of these had been released and how many were still being detained inside or outside the Gaza strip by the Israel authorities.\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n | |