\n
A. Election of officers<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n\n
11.\t<\/span>At its 149th meeting, on 14 January 1988, the Committee decided to re-elect the following officers:<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n
\n
\n\n| \n Chairman<\/u>:<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n H.E. Mr. Massamba Sarré (Senegal)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| \n Vice-Chairmen<\/u>:<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n H.E. Mr. Oscar Oramas-Oliva (Cuba)<\/p>\n H.E. Mr. Shah Mohammad Dost (Afghanistan)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\n| \n Rapporteur<\/u>:<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n H.E. Mr. Alexander Borg Olivier (Malta)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n \n \t<\/span> <\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 12.\t<\/span>At its 155th meeting, on 23 August 1988, the Committee elected H.E. Mrs. Absa Claude Diallo (Senegal) as Chairman in place of H.E. Mr. Massamba Sarré (Senegal) who had left New York on another assignment for his country.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 13.\t<\/span>At its 150th meeting, on 10 March 1988, the Committee adopted its programme of work for 1988 (A\/AC.183\/1988\/CRP.1\/Rev.1) in implementation of its mandate.<\/p><\/div>\n\n B. Participation in the work of the Committee<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n\n 14.\t<\/span>As in previous years, the Committee reconfirmed that all States Members of the United Nations and Permanent Observers to the United Nations desiring to participate in the work of the Committee as observers were welcome to do so. Accordingly, in a letter dated 30 March 1988, the Chairman of the Committee so informed the Secretary-General, who subsequently transmitted the letter, on 20 April 1988, to States Members of the United Nations and members of the specialized agencies, and to intergovernmental regional organizations. The Committee also decided to invite the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to participate in the work of the Committee as an observer, to attend all its meetings and to make observations and proposals for the consideration of the Committee.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 15.\t<\/span>During 1988 the Committee again welcomed as observers all the States and organizations that had participated in its work in the preceding year. 4<\/u>\/<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n C. Re-establishment of the Working Group<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n\n 16.\t<\/span>At its 149th meeting, the Committee re-established its Working Group to assist in the preparation and expedition of the work of the Committee. The Working Group was constituted as before under the chairmanship of Mr. Alexander Borg Olivier (Malta), on the understanding that any Committee member or observer could participate in its proceedings.5<\/u>\/ Mr. Pramathesh Rath (India) was re-elected Vice-Chairman of the Working Group.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n
\n \n<\/p><\/div>\n \n IV. ACTION TAKEN BY THE COMMITTEE<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n \t<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n\n \n\n| \n A.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Action taken in accordance with General Assembly<\/u><\/p>\n resolution 42\/66 A of 2 December 1987<\/u><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n \n \n\n| \n 1.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n | \n Review of the situation relating to the question of Palestine<\/u><\/p>\n and efforts to implement the recommendations of the Committee<\/u><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n <\/p>\n \n 17.\t<\/span>In accordance with its mandate, in the year under review, the Committee continued to follow developments relating to the question of Palestine and to exert all efforts to promote the implementation of its recommendations as repeatedly endorsed by the General Assembly.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 18.\t<\/span>In response to events in the region affecting the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, the Chairman of the Committee, on repeated occasions, whenever urgent action was required, brought such developments to the attention of the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council, and called for appropriate measures in accordance with United Nations resolutions (see sect. A.2 (a) below).<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 19.\t<\/span>The Committee was alarmed at the serious deterioration of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territories as a result of the increasing resort by Israel to armed force and other draconian measures in an effort to suppress the popular uprising, which began in early December 1987, against the continued occupation and gradual annexation of the occupied Palestinian territories and against the Israeli policies and practices violating the rights of the Palestinian people.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 20.\t<\/span>The Committee monitored the situation on an ongoing basis through the media, the reports of missions dispatched to the area by United Nations organs and agencies as well as by non-governmental organizations, the reports of individual experts and persons from the occupied territories who participated in meetings held under the auspices of the Committee, information collected by Governments, and other sources.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 21.\t<\/span>According to this information, the number of Palestinians shot to death by Israeli armed forces since early December 1987 had reached a total of 248 identified cases by<\/p><\/div>\n\n 27 September 1988. Another 126 Palestinians had died from beatings, tear gas inhalation, and other causes related to actions by Israeli armed forces and Israeli settlers. Thousands of Palestinians had been wounded or had suffered crushed bones in beatings administered at random by Israeli soldiers in implementation of the policy of "might, force and beatings" to suppress the uprising, announced by the Israeli Defence Minister in January 1988. The Committee was alarmed at the high proportion of youths and children among the victims. The Committee also noted with grave concern various reports that the total casualty toll among Palestinians was probably much higher because of the fear of many Palestinians that they would be arrested if they went to a hospital for treatment of wounds, and because the repeated sealing of entire areas, measures to restrict the activities of the press and the detention and harassment of journalists and human rights workers had made it increasingly difficult to collect systematic information on the situation. The Committee also expressed grave preoccupation at the growing involvement of armed Israeli settlers in attacks against the Palestinian population, and at the announced policy of the authorities to allow settlers to shoot Palestinian demonstrators seen carrying what seemed to be firebombs.<\/p><\/div>\n <\/p>\n \n 22.\t<\/span>In this connection, the Committee was extremely concerned at reports by humanitarian assistance organizations that were able to visit the area that medical personnel was refused access to camps and villages closed by the military and that hospitals had been attacked, equipment destroyed, medical personnel and patients beaten, and that patients had been arrested and taken away. In view of the high number of casualties, the Committee was alarmed at information that the health situation in the occupied territories and particularly in Gaza had reached catastrophic proportions and that hospitals were facing severe shortages because the authorities were restricting access to medical supplies. In this connection, the Committee deplored that the Special Committee of Experts of the World Health Organization (WHO) had again been refused access to the occupied territories and noted that the information collected by that Committee had caused it to express deep concern regarding the health situation in the occupied territories.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 23.\t<\/span>The Committee further noted that, in addition to the use of force, the Israeli authorities had resorted to a policy of mass arrests, imposition of administrative detention without charges or trial, and deportations, in its efforts to eradicate the leadership of the uprising. Human rights organizations estimated that, by the end of September 1988, about 5,500 Palestinians remained in detention, 2,500 of whom had been placed under administrative detention without charges or trial. Several new prison camps had been built, where conditions were reported to be in clear violation of international human rights standards. There were numerous reports of severe overcrowding, mistreatment and beating, and even killing of prisoners, lack of hygiene and unavailability of medical care. Several cases of torture were also reported. In addition, since the beginning of the uprising, the Israeli authorities deported 33 Palestinians from the occupied territories and issued deportation orders on another 25, in defiance of Security Council resolutions and of the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 24.\t<\/span>The Committee was also gravely concerned at the reported escalation of collective punishment measures directed against the entire Palestinian population. Repeatedly, Israeli forces had declared entire areas closed military zones and placed the population under extended curfews, sealing all entry points to villages and camps and preventing the delivery of foodstuffs and other essential items such as fuel and medicines; electricity and telephone service were repeatedly interrupted; thousands of trees were uprooted and crops bulldozed; and property was randomly destroyed in raids on Palestinian homes, which were reported to have become a regular occurrence. Some 236 homes were reported to have been destroyed as of 23 September 1988, displacing thousands of Palestinians, and hundreds more were reportedly scheduled for demolition.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 25.\t<\/span>The Committee further noted that Israel had imposed severe restrictions on freedom of movement within and outside the occupied territories and had intensified its restrictions on travel abroad. In this connection, the Committee strongly deplored that the Israeli authorities had denied permission to travel to persons from the occupied territories who had been invited by the Committee to participate in meetings of non-governmental organizations held under its auspices.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 26.\t<\/span>The growing resort by Israel to the use of force against the Palestinian population in general was accompanied by an intensification of measures against Palestinian economic, social and cultural institutions. Universities and other educational institutions, which had suffered frequent closings and other disruptions prior to the uprising, were closed on the West Bank from December 1987 to May 1988, and then again for varying periods of time. Most schools were also repeatedly closed in the Gaza Strip. A large number of schools in the occupied territories were sequestered by the army, for its own use, and school property destroyed. All teachers newly appointed at the beginning of the 1987-1988 academic year were dismissed. Palestinian trade unions were also the object of harassment and punitive measures. Twenty-four unions, as well as the General Federation of Trade Unions were reported to have been closed since the beginning of the uprising, and a number of trade unionists were arrested, placed under administrative detention, or expelled. The Palestine Press Service was closed for six months and other Palestinian publications were the object of harassment through repeated closings, disruption of distribution, and the arrest and detention of many Palestinian journalists. At the end of June 1988, the military commander of the West Bank ordered closed the relief organization In'ash el-Usra, which served the needs of over 15,000 Palestinians, for two years, the first such self-help community group to be so closed. Many Palestinian institutions were also closed and popular committees outlawed, and their members arrested.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 27.\t<\/span>In addition, the Israeli authorities adopted a number of stringent administrative and economic measures directed at further strengthening their control over key aspects of life in the occupied territories, and to stifle Palestinian resistance to the occupation, particularly efforts to boycott the military authorities. The authorities engaged in aggressive collection of back taxes, linking proof of payment of all Israeli taxes to the issuance of any official document (such as drivers licences, marriage or birth certificates) and, in the Gaza Strip, to the requirement that existing identity cards be replaced by new ones. Direct export of agricultural produce from the occupied territories was prohibited, thus causing great material damage to Palestinian farmers, who are dependent on exports for the marketing of their produce. In addition, the amount of money that Palestinians could bring across was reduced to one fifth the amount previously allowed, thus almost eliminating the possibility of indirect export and severely reducing the amount of remittances from Palestinians working abroad, on which many families depended. The restrictions were also causing great difficulties to voluntary organizations providing services not supplied by the occupation authorities. The authorities also repeatedly imposed the closing of Palestinian shops of an essential nature, such as bakeries and pharmacies, and forced the opening of others in an effort to break protest strikes.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 28.\t<\/span>These measures directed at suppressing the uprising were taken against a backdrop of intensified <\/span>de facto<\/u><\/span> annexation of the occupied territories. The total area of land confiscated by Israel since 1967 had reached almost 2.8 million dunums (1 dunam = 1,000 m<\/span>2<\/sup><\/span>), i.e. more than half the land area of the occupied Palestinian territories, by May\/1988. The number of settlements reached 170 in the West Bank and 20 in the Gaza Strip, and the establishment of new settlements and the expansion of existing ones were announced. Stringent restrictions continued to be imposed on water use, new construction, the granting of credit and other activities necessary for the development of the territories.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n \n 29.\t<\/span>The Committee noted with great concern that in his annual report on the situation of workers in the occupied Arab territories, based on three missions to the area, the Director-General of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) had concluded that the clashes resulting from the uprising and the repressive and other measures which had ensued gravely affected the situation of Arab workers in those territories. The report expressed concern that the situation of Arab workers, which was already seriously affected by the occupation, was likely to be increasingly aggravated if the occupation continued and if the serious events taking place in the territories persisted or assumed greater dimensions. The repercussions on employment and on living and working conditions, in the view of the ILO, could be extremely grave.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p>\n | | |