{"id":186573,"date":"2010-01-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:06:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/?p=186573"},"modified":"2019-03-11T22:06:05","modified_gmt":"2019-03-11T22:06:05","slug":"auto-insert-186573","status":"publish","type":"document","link":"https:\/\/www.un.org\/unispal\/document\/auto-insert-186573\/","title":{"rendered":"Rights of Child convention\/Children and armed conflict protocol\/Initial report of Israel – List of issues\/Israel reply – Addendum"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

Unedited version<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Convention on the Rights of the Child<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

WRITTEN REPLIES BY THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL CONCERNING THE LIST OF ISSUES (<\/strong><\/span>CRC\/C\/OPAC\/ISR\/Q\/1<\/strong><\/a>) TO BE TAKEN UP IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF THE INITIAL REPORT OF ISRAEL UNDER ARTICLE 8, PARAGRAPH 1, OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE INVOLVEMENT OF CHILDREN IN ARMED CONFLICT (CRC\/C\/OPAC\/ISR\/1) * **<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

[Received on 7 January 2010]<\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span> <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

___________________________<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

 <\/span>*In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services.<\/span><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

** Annexe 1 is circulated as received in English only. Annexe 2 is available in the Secretariat’s file.<\/span> <\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n

  <\/span><\/p><\/div>\n
\n

1. Please provide information whether there is a specific penal provision for the crime of recruitment or use in hostilities of a person who is under the age of 18. In view of the State party’s international legal obligations, the Committee furthermore requests information regarding the corresponding applicable penal provision in the Palestinian Occupied Territory. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : As detailed in Israel's Initial Report, recruitment to the IDF is regulated through the Defence Service Law (Consolidated Version) <\/i>5746-1986. Further, the IDF is the only military body and\/or agency in the State of Israel. No armed groups distinct from the IDF exist in Israel, nor are they allowed to operate. This is in accordance with the Israel Defence Forces Ordinance<\/i>, and Section 6 of Basic Law: The Army<\/i> (1976), which holds that: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n\t\t\t\t"No armed force other then the Defence Army of Israel shall be established or maintained except under law".\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n

In addition, Section 143 of the Penal Law<\/i> 5737-1977 (the "Penal Law <\/i>") criminalizes unlawful military activities, as detailed in para. 62 of Israel's Initial Report: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Section 143 – Unlawful Military Activities <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n\t\t\t\t (a)   If a person did one of the following, then he is liable to seven years imprisonment: <\/i>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t(1)   He drilled or trained others – without permission from the Government – in the use of arms or the performance of military exercises, movements or operations; <\/i>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t(2)   He was present at a meeting or assembly of persons held without permission from the Government, in order to drill or train other persons in the use of arms or the practice of military exercises, movements or operations. <\/i>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t(b)   If he trains or drills the use of arms or the practice of military exercises, movements or operations at a meeting or assembly convened without Government permission or is present therein order to be so trained or drilled, then he is liable to three years’ imprisonment. <\/i>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\n

Israel's position on the inapplicability of the Convention on the Rights of the Child beyond its territory has been presented to the Committee on previous occasions. Israel's position in this regard remains unchanged. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2. Please indicate whether the Defence Services Law 5746-1986 referred to in the State party report foresees sanctions in case of direct participation in hostilities by members of their armed forces below the age of 18 years. Specifically, the Committee would like the State party to clarify the statement in the State party report, paragraph 9, that “virtually all recruits will be over 18 before they are required to participate in combat duty” and explain how this is compatible with the State party’s obligations under the Protocol and the declaration made upon its ratification. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong>: <\/i>There is no specific sanction encapsulated in Israeli legislation regarding cases of direct participation in hostilities by members of Israeli armed forces below the age of 18 years. However, as detailed in Israel's Initial Report, Section 6 of Basic Law: The Army<\/i> (1976), stipulates that no armed force other than the IDF shall be established or maintained in Israel; and Section 143 of the Penal Law<\/i> prohibits unlawful military activities and imposes a penalty for violations of this provision in the form of imprisonment for a period of time ranging from 3-7 years. The effect of these two laws, when taken together, is that Israel has a single armed force, which bars the participation of minors' in hostilities. Therefore, direct participation by minors in hostilities is forbidden. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

With respect to the specific statement that has been cited from Israel's Initial Report, the State of Israel reiterates that the statement in paragraph 9 to the Initial Report refers to isolated instances in which a person under the age of 18 is recruited to a special (elite) unit, which requires long-term training that is held only once a year, as detailed in paragraph 8 to the Initial Report. However, while the individual may begin training when he\/she is under the age of 18, it is crucial to note that due to the length of the training process required in the relevant elite units, as well as the fact that the commanders are given clear instructions prohibiting any person below the age of 18 from taking direct part in combat duty, the said person shall be over 18 if and when they take part in combat duty. Any commander that fails to comply with this requirement is in violation of internal IDF regulations. This, in accordance with Israel's obligations under the Protocol and the declaration it made upon its ratification thereof. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Statistics<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Current IDF data indicates that between November 11, 2007 and December 12, 2009 – 562 persons designated for service, aged under 18 (according to the Gregorian calendar) were called for service. 181 of them were academic reserves and the Hesder Yeshivas, a program which combines advanced Talmudic studies with military service the IDF, as detailed in the Initial Report. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3. Please indicate whether Israel assumes extraterritorial jurisdiction over the war crime of conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 into the armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. Please indicate whether Israeli courts have jurisdiction in case of forced recruitment or involvement in hostilities of a child if committed outside Israel, by or against an Israeli citizen. Please provide copies of jurisprudence, if applicable <\/i>. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : According to Section 16 ("Offences against the Law of Nations") of the Israeli Penal Law<\/i>, the Penal Law<\/i> applies to crimes committed abroad which the State of Israel has undertaken to penalize by virtue of its ratifying International Multilateral Conventions, which are open for accession by any state. Thus, it is possible to assume extraterritorial jurisdiction over the war crime of conscripting or enlisting children under the age of 15 into the armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities, based on Article 4 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts and Article 38 to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which were signed and ratified by Israel. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

According to the provisions of Section 16 of the Penal Law, extraterritorial jurisdiction will only be assumed by Israeli courts when no exemption from criminal liability regarding the offense exists under the law of the foreign country, and the offender has not already been acquitted or served his\/her sentence in the foreign country. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

With respect to the forced recruitment or involvement in hostilities of a minor: if hostilities are committed outside Israel against an Israeli citizen, according to Section 14(a) to the Penal Law<\/i>, which states that the Penal Law<\/i> applies to crimes committed abroad against the life, body, health or freedom of an Israeli citizen or resident, when the maximum punishment for the crime is one year of imprisonment or more. It should be noted that when the offense was committed in the sovereign territory of another state, Section 14(b)(1) requires (in addition to the aforementioned exceptions) that double criminality of the offense exists before Section 14(a) can be implemented. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In the event of the forced recruitment or involvement in hostilities of a minor by an Israeli citizen outside Israel, the Penal Law<\/i> will apply and Israeli courts will be able to exercise extraterritorial jurisdiction as Section 15 of the Penal Law<\/i> stipulates that the Law applies to crimes committed abroad by a person who was, at the time of committing the offence or thereafter, an Israeli citizen or resident, provided that the punishment for the crime is more than three months of imprisonment or is a fine which is higher than the amount which can be imposed regarding an offense for which the penalty is a nonspecific fine (Section 24 to the Penal Law<\/i>).<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Penal Law<\/i> also creates offences which, if committed, could result in the implementation of Sections 14(a) and 15, and therefore the application of Israeli law to a matter. For example, Section 143 criminalizes unlawful military exercises (as detailed in paragraph 62 of Israel's Initial Report regarding the Protocol), and Section 369 criminalizes the abduction of a person (forcing a person by using force, threats or deceit to make him\/her leave his\/her whereabouts). <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The relevant sections of the Penal Law<\/i> are attached as Annex 1<\/strong>. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

4 . Please inform the Committee of progress made to comply with the recommendation issued to the State party in 2002 (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.195, para. 25) regarding the discriminatory definition of the child between Israeli children (18 years) and Palestinian children in the OPT (16 years according to Military Order 132). Please clarify whether Military Order 132 has been rescinded <\/i>. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

5. Please inform the Committee whether the Defence Services Law 5746-1986 prohibits the use of children in hostilities, notably for as informants for intelligence purposes and as human shields. Please inform the Committee of measures taken to ensure compliance with the ruling of the High Court of Justice Adalah et al. v. Commander of the Central Region et al. <\/i>1 <\/i>In view of reports indicating the continued use by the Israeli army of Palestinian children as human shields, please indicate to the Committee whether such reports have been investigated, which jurisdiction has been responsible for such investigations and whether sanctions have been applied. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

6. Please inform the Committee of progress made to comply with the recommendations issued to the State party in 2002 (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.195, paras. 62 and 63) regarding the practices of arrest and interrogation of children in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Please clarify whether provisions in military orders (specifically no. 378 and 1500) which violate international standards on the administration of juvenile justice have been rescinded. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

7. Please provide information on the definition of terrorist charges which can be brought against children and whether such trials have been carried out in the ordinary justice system or in military courts. Please indicate how many children have been accused with terrorist offenses since July 2005. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Charges against minors<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Israeli Penal Law<\/i> 5737-1977, Terror Prevention Ordinance <\/i>of 1948, the Defense Regulations (Emergency)<\/i> 1945 and the Prohibition on Terrorist Financing Law, 5765-2004<\/i> , apply to every person that can be criminally liable, the specific provisions regarding minors relate to procedures and penalties. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Trials are held in the relevant Israeli court of law according to Section 6 of the Criminal Procedure <\/i>Law [Consolidated Version<\/i>] 5742-1982<\/i> , which stipulates that a defendant shall be brought before a court of law based either on the location where the offence was committed, in full or in part, or the defendant's residence. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Statistics<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

There are no aggregated statistics regarding indictments filed against minors in security related offences. Several examples of some of the recent indictments are detailed below.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Indictments Filed against Minors who Committed Security Offenses<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

R.H.<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

R.H. was born in1989, and is a resident an Eastern neighborhood of Jerusalem. R.H. has been held in detention since December 10, 2008, and an indictment against him was filed on January 4, 2009, (at which time he was an adult), while some of the offenses were committed when he was a minor. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

During 2007, R.H. was recruited to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist organization, and since then he has been a member of the organization. R.H. conspired with other member of the organization to commit terrorist acts against the Jewish population in Jerusalem, such as throwing incendiary bombs, stabbing and firing weapons, and for this purpose, R.H. obtained a handgun in November 2008. In addition, R.H. committed acts of support of the PFLP, such as spraying graffiti, distributing leaflets, hanging signboards and participating in support rallies of the organization. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Subsequently, R.H. was indicted for the following offenses: conspiracy to commit a crime (in accordance with Section 499(a)(1) of the Penal Law<\/i> 5737-1977), the possession of a weapon (Section 144(a) of the Penal Law<\/i> ) and membership in a terrorist organization (Section 3 of the Terror Prevention Ordinance<\/i> 5708-1948). R.H. entered a plea bargain, in terms of which the indictment was amended, and he was sentenced to three years imprisonment.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A.G.<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A.G. was born in 1990, and is a resident of an Eastern neighborhood of Jerusalem. A.G. has been detained since August 12, 2008, and an indictment was filed against him on January 4, 2009 (at which time he was an adult), for offences, several of which were committed when he was a minor. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

During 2008, A.G. was recruited to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist organization, and since then he has been a member of the organization. A.G. co nspired with other members of the organization to commit terrorist acts against the Jewish population in Jerusalem, such as throwing incendiary bombs, stabbing and firing weapons. In addition, he actively supported the PFLP, by spraying graffiti, distributing leaflets, hanging signboards and participating in support rallies. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Therefore, A.G. was indicted for these offenses: conspiracy to commit a crime (in accordance to Section 499(a)(1) of the Penal Law<\/i> ), and membership in a terrorist organization (Section 3 of the Terror Prevention Ordinance<\/i> ). A.G. entered a plea bargain, in which the indictment was amended, and a sentence of 22 months of imprisonment was agreed. A.G. awaits a Probation Officer Report that must be submitted to the court. Thus, the sentence has been commuted to begin in February 2010. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

R.S.R.S.<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

R.S. was born in 1993, and an indictment against him was filed on December 14, 2009. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

During 2009, R.S. illegally purchased a 7mm handgun and a 9mm "Star" handgun, and later purchased over 150 bullets. Subsequently, R.S. was indicted for the following offenses: purchasing a weapon (Section 144(a) of the Penal Law<\/i> ) and carrying a weapon (Section 144(b)). R.S. is currently detained (and will remain so until January 2010), when an additional hearing will be conducted after the submission of a Probation Officer Report in his regard. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Please see also the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

8. Please inform the Committee whether international juvenile justice standards have been applied and what procedural guarantees have been put in place to guarantee children’s right to a fair trial. Furthermore, please explain the measures taken to prevent incommunicado detention and solitary confinement of children accused of terrorist offenses. Please also provide details whether the provision of legal assistance and access to family visits is guaranteed. How does the State party make sure that detention of children is only used as a measure of last resort and for the shortest appropriate period of time <\/i>? <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> :<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A Committee, chaired by Deputy President of Tel Aviv District Court, Saviona Rotlevi, was appointed in 1997 by the Minister of Justice. The Committee was asked to provide recommendations regarding the rights enumerated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In 2003, the Committee presented its recommendations. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Minister appointed the Committee to thoroughly examine the Israeli legislation concerning the rights of the child and the child’s legal and welfare status, in light of the principles established by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, so as to ensure that the State would meet its commitments under the Convention. It was also asked to assess the need to draft an integrative law regarding the status of children and youth on the basis of a comprehensive, uniform perspective. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Committee involved approximately 70 senior public and other officials from a variety of fields, including the Courts Administration and the Ministries of Justice, Labor and Social Affairs, representatives of departments of social work and professors from the Law and Psychology Faculties of several universities. Representatives of children's mental health services and the Israeli Bar Association were also involved in this project.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Six reports prepared by Sub-Committees were submitted to the Minister of Justice, one of which dealt with Children in Criminal Proceedings. One of the central outcomes of this report was a wide-ranging amendment to the legislation governing minors in criminal proceedings. Some of these amendments have been finalized – for example, an initiative for comprehensive reform of the Youth (Trial, Punishment and Modes of Treatment) Law<\/i> 5731-1971<\/i> (the 'Youth Law<\/i> ”) and a proposed bill protecting the eligibility of children at risk for services. Amendment No. 14 to the Youth Law <\/i>was issued on July 21, 2008 and has entered into force in July 2009 (henceforth: " Amendment No. 14<\/i>" or " the Amendment<\/i>").<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The primary changes to the law as a result of the amendments are conceptual, rather than technical. Notably, the primary guiding principles are the best interests of the child and viewing the child as a separate human being. This is evident in the separate representation of the child, the involvement of the child in the decision-making process, and the notification to parents of an investigation, yet their removal if the child objects or the officer thinks it is harmful for the child’s wellbeing. All of these changes are compatible with the child’s best interests. The conceptual revolution to the laws is also manifested in evaluating every situation from the child's perspective, and not the parental point of view. The child is treated as an individual, not a parental protégé. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

This Amendment greatly improves the treatment of minors in criminal proceedings. The Amendment supplements an introduction in a new Section: 1A-1C, as part of the General Principles. This section facilitates the right of a minor to be heard, the respect for the minor's view in matters affecting her\/him and promotes participation in decisions influential to the minor. The amendment regards the way it is done, as in with keeping her\/his dignity and involving the minor in decision-making by law. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Amendment views children as individuals, and concentrates on the implementation of the child's Human Rights in legal proceedings in which the minor partakes. Such proceedings ought to be handled in such a way as to protect the minor's dignity. As a rule, proper consideration is given to the minor’s rehabilitation, treatment and integration into society, subject to the minor’s age and level of maturity. The purpose of this amendment is to augment and add to the rights granted to minors. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Amendment strives to further enhance and provide better protection of the human dignity of a minor who is arrested, imprisoned or questioned and to ensure they are provided with conditions compatible with their age and needs. Among other things, the minor is encouraged to maintain contact with members of her\/his family; and the minor’s wellbeing is closely monitored. The novelty is in the reference to the child's emotional needs, her\/his feeling etc. The Law did not oblige this prior to this amendment with regard to involvement in decision and expressing the minor’s view on the matter. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Police Investigation<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

When a minor who is suspected of committing a crime is called to a police station for investigation, the minor's parents or a close relative (in cases where the parents cannot be located following all reasonable efforts) must be notified. A child residing in a group home will be summoned subject to the group home's superintendent's knowledge and parental notification. Once again, if the parent is not located following all reasonable efforts; another adult who is a family member known to the minor will be notified.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In other circumstances (such as when a minor is detained) the police officer who is in charge at the time of detention, is required to notify the parents or other close relatives as to the child's whereabouts. Simultaneously, the officer informs the minor about the family member being notified. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

When a minor suspected of committing a crime arrives on his\/her own initiative to the police station, or was brought by someone else to the police station while under arrest or even when not under arrest, a parent or a family member must be notified – unless – the minor expressly states that he\/she objects to such notification. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A notification will not be made when the minor expresses a clear objection to the notification. If the minor has been arrested, his\/her objection will be considered in light of his\/her age and level of maturity. The minor's objection must be specified, reported and filed. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A police officer's final decision – whether or not to notify the minor's parents – must be documented visually, vocally or in writing. The officer's decision must include a detailed explanation of his decision and provide substantive consideration to the minor's objection. If the officer decides not to inform the parents, he\/she must then inform another close relative. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

These principles constitute an obligation to act in accordance with the best interests of the child (a primary consideration) as well as the rights and duties of the child's parents. As mentioned above, the Law stipulates that the minor’s parent or close relative ought to be informed. However, under certain circumstances, an authorized officer may summon a minor, who is not arrested, to an investigation without such notification. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

When a minor suspect is summoned to an investigation previously agreed to by his\/her parent or family member, he\/she is entitled to have them present during the investigation and\/or to consult with them. Unless the minor objects to the family member's presence or she\/he is under arrest. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A decision to investigate a minor with no parent or close relative present shall be documented. Such documentation must include justification for the decision specified by the officer in charge. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

If a parent or a family member's presence in the investigation room interrupts or interferes in any way, for instance, threatens the minor in a direct or implied manner, the investigator is authorized to remove them from the room. A decision to remove a parent from the room must be made in writing. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Prior to the investigation of a minor, an investigator shall notify the minor of his\/her rights and obligations particularized by law in a simple intelligible language, that is appropriate for the minor's age and level of maturity. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

All the sections of the Law dealing with the notification and presence of a parent or other relative were added by Amendment No. 14. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Notification of a Court Hearing Which Involves a Court<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The youth investigator and\/or the prosecutor in the minor's pre-trial (arrest) hearing must notify the minor's parent or a close relative about the hearing. The minor's parent or a close relative are invited to appear before the court and express their opinion regarding the relevance of their presence at the hearing (Section 10(H) (a) to Amendment No. 14). Prior to this Amendment, the parents would have been notified of the hearing, but were not able to express their opinion, by law, regarding their presence. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Children's Rights<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

There are no specific instructions to appoint an attorney for a minor in every case, even though the proceedings may infringe on the minor’s rights (with her\/his parents’ tacit consent or even support). However, Family Matters Courts and Juvenile Courts are authorized to appoint a legal guardian for the minor in proceedings under the Youth Law (Care and Supervision)<\/i> 5720-1960 (the " Youth Law (Care and Supervision))<\/i> , and appoint a defense council in other legal proceedings. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Legal Representation of Minors<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Under Amendment No. 14, an indicted minor is entitled to representation. The court is also authorized, based on what it believes to be the best interests of the child, to appoint a defense attorney for a minor even though an indictment has not been filed. According to Section 22 of Amendment No. 14 – in certain matters, the court will rule only after the child's parents have been given the opportunity to express their opinion on the matter. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Amendment also determines that all through the legal proceedings, if a minor is not represented or his\/her parents are absent; the court is authorized to appoint a legal guardian based on what it finds to be the best interests of the child. Legal instructions and case law emphasizes the importance of individual legal representation, principally when the lack of such representation imperils the interest of the minor. It also emphasizes the right of the child to be heard when there is a conflict between him\/her and his\/her parents. Under the Guardianship and Legal Capacity Law <\/i>5723-1962, parents or guardians are appointed by the court to represent minors in legal proceedings; they can however, appoint someone else to represent their child. The Law authorizes the court to appoint a representative on behalf of the child (a legal guardian or an attorney). <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Appointing a Public Defense Attorney to represent minors makes it possible for more minors to be represented in criminal proceedings. The Public Defence Law, 5755-1995<\/i> , (henceforth: the "Public Defence Law") <\/i>that was amended on July 30, 2008, by Amendment No. 14 provides a complete care for the obligation of child representation. This entails a new concept in the Israeli law, in a binding minor' representation, as is the separation between a child and his\/her parents according to a separate examination of the interests of the child. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A Minor's Rights in Legal Proceedings are as Follows<\/u> : <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1)\t<\/span>A right to private consultation with a defence attorney and a right to be represented by a defence attorney. The Public Defenders Office (Entitlement of Additional Minors to Representation) Regulations <\/i>5758-1998 entitles a minor detainee or a minor involved in legal proceedings to representation by a public defender (Amendment No. 14).<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2)\t<\/span>Section 18(a) to the Youth Law<\/i> empowers the Juvenile Court to appoint counsel for minor's in legal proceedings on the grounds of the best interests of the child. The court holds this power all through the criminal proceedings including during the investigation stage. Moreover, the minor is entitled to any right valid under the Public Defenders Office Law.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

3)\t<\/span>A right to the presence of a parent or family member.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Revocation of liberty<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Detention <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Youth Law and the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Powers – Arrests) Law<\/i> 1996 – 5756 (henceforth: the " Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law<\/i> ") establishes restrictions concerning the holding of minors in detention. Adults may be detained without a court order for 24 hours, while children who are under 14 years of age may be detained without a court order for only 12 hours; in special circumstances, the on-duty officer at a police station may order continued detention for an additional period not to exceed 12 hours. Amendment No. 14 stipulates that a decision to hold a minor on a Saturday or a holiday requires the approval of youth district officer. Here, the novelty is in the reduction and limitations of days and hours of detention.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Amendment sets the abovementioned period of extension under the following circumstances:<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

1)\t<\/span>Constitution of a sufficient cause specified in Section 29 of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

2)\t<\/span>Where a decision to extend the period of detention of an arrested minor could not be made prior to midnight, and the minor could not be brought before a judge due to the end of working hours, the minor shall be brought before a judge immediately upon the resumption of opening hours. With regard to a minor’s age (14-18 at present), a minor's detention without a court order is similar to that of an adult, they may be detained without a court order up to 24 hours; in special circumstances, this period may be extended by an additional 24 hours. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Youth Law <\/i>and the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law <\/i>establish restrictions pertinent to the detention of minors. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The periods of detention of minors prior to indictment are as follows: the Amendment in question reflects a new approach in the Israeli law that accords with the spirit of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Under Section 17 of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law <\/i>that addresses detention prior to indictment, a Juvenile Court is authorized to order the detention of a minor for a period that is not to exceed 10 days (15 days for an adult). A suspect minor may not be detained continuously for a period in excess of 20 days (30 days for an adult). A petition to extend detention may be filed subject to the approval of the Attorney General. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Under Section 21 of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law<\/i> , that addresses detention following an indictment, the court may order detention until the termination of proceedings subject to Amendment No. 14 to the Youth Law <\/i>which stipulates that:<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

a) Detention until the termination of proceedings will not apply to a minor who is under 14 years of age. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

b) A minor may not be detained continuously for a period in excess of 20 days. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Subsequent to Amendment No. 14 to the Youth Law,<\/i> Section 59 of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law <\/i>that stipulates that an adult may be detained for 75 days if an indictment was not filed, states that if an indictment is not filed, then a minor is to be detained for a maximum period of 40 days. Here, the novelty is in the reduction and limitations of days and hours of detention.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

When there is no verdict, a minor is not to be detained for a period in excess of 6 months (9 months for an adult). The Amendment also stipulates that the maximum period of detention for an accused minor is 45 days instead of the 90 days permitted with respect to an adult (Section 62 to the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law).<\/i> Here, also, the innovation is in the reduction and limitations of days and hours of detention. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Closed Residence <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

A closed residence may serve as an alternative to imprisonment. Closed residences, as defined in the Youth Law<\/i> , serve as an out-of-home-placement or the locus of custody for a minor referred by the Supervisor of Residences. A minor may be placed at a closed residence as a penalty or as a treatment alternative to a penalty. Also, a minor who is under the age of criminal liability, and a minor who is a danger to him\/herself and\/or others and who has been declared a minor in need may be placed at a closed residence. The prohibition against leaving a place of residence (on condition of bail) by a minor (according to Section 48(a) (9) to the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law)<\/i> is for a maximum period of 9 months. Nevertheless, the court may issue an order to extend the period for a period not to exceed 90 days. When issuing such an order that prohibits a minor from leaving his\/her place of residence for over 16 hours a day, the court shall re-examine the instruction once every 3 months during that time.<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Separation <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Section 13 to the Youth Law <\/i>requires the separation of minors and adult detainees. This section was amended in 2008 to include more detailed requirements regarding such separation. Amendment No. 14 sets that a minor is to be held in a separate detention facility for minors or in a separate section for minors within a regular detention facility. There is an exception for a female minor who can be held in a detention cell together with an adult female detainee. This is subject to the minor's agreement and the following conditions: holding the minor alone is not in her favor; holding the minor with an adult detainee is in her best interests (or there is no possibility of holding the minor with another minor) and such holding does not risk the physical or mental health of the minor. Such holding is to be approved by a court within 24 hours. The Amendment also stipulates that a detained minor who is in the custody of the prison authority is entitled to a meeting with a social worker within 24 hours, or as soon as possible after the end of a Saturday or a holiday. Here, too, the novelty is in the reduction and limitations on days and hours of detention as well as a social worker visit within 24 hours. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Detention for Protective Purposes<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

It is permissible to detain a minor to protect him\/her. Section 10(3) of the Youth Law <\/i>stipulates that “the judge before whom a minor is brought is authorized to order his\/her detention if this is required to ensure the minor’s personal safety or to remove him\/her from the company of an undesirable individual”. A police officer is authorized to order detention on such grounds for 12 hours, and in special circumstances up to 24 hours until the minor is brought before a judge. Here, too, the Amendment reduced and limited the days and hours of detention. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Detention and\/or Minor Custody<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

A minor suspected of committing a crime shall not be detained if there is a satisfactory alternative. Thus, children are placed in closed and open educational residences provided that they are closely monitored and receive treatment. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

If a request to arrest a minor was filed to a court, a probation officer is permitted to take the initiative and submit his\/her report or express his\/her professional opinion regarding matter. If the minor is being indicted, the court is authorized to instruct the submission of a Probation Officer Report or agree to an oral presentation of his\/her professional opinion (Section 10(G) (b) of Amendment No. 14). When a detained minor resides and\/or is being held in a secured group home, the group home officer is permitted to submit his\/her professional opinion regarding the minor's arrest (Section 10(G) (c) of Amendment No. 14). Non-submission of a Probation Officer Report may not, in and of itself, establish grounds for the continuance of the minor’s arrest (Section10 (G) (d) to Amendment No. 14). The innovation here is the need for the opinion of the group home supervisor and the Probation Officer Report. The court requires as many opinions as possible prior to reaching a decision; as well as hearing the view of the child. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Section 21 of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law <\/i>addresses the issue of detention following the filing of an indictment. When an indictment has been filed, the court must set the earliest date possible for the commencement of a trial (Regulation 19 of the Criminal Procedure Regulations<\/i> ). In the case of a minor, Section 14 of the Youth Law <\/i>stipulates that, “save with the consent of the Attorney General, a minor will not be brought to trial for an offense if a year has passed since its commission”. Once an indictment has been filed, the court is entitled to order detention until the termination of the proceedings. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Residence\/Supervision Orders, Out-of-Home-Placement and Detention Alternatives <\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

When considering an alternative to imprisonment, a closed residence is an adequate substitute for incarceration. Release on condition of bail (according to Section 48(a) (9) of the Criminal Procedure (Arrests) Law<\/i> ) is not to exceed 9 months. Nevertheless, the court may issue an order to extend leave on bail for an additional period, not to exceed 90 days each time. If the court has issued an order on condition of bail for house arrest of more than 16 hours per day, it shall order a hearing once every 3 months throughout that time. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Order of Supervision<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Following the filing of an indictment, a Juvenile Court is authorized to order temporary supervision of the minor by a probation officer. The order applies until the court issues its ruling. The court decision is subject to the Probation Officer Report and the court's conviction that the temporary custody order is in the best interests of the child. The court must also ensure that there is no other, less harmful, way to achieve this objective. Here, too, the principle of the “ best interests of the child<\/i> ” concept is inserted as a legally required consideration.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Sentencing of Children, Capital Punishment, and Life Imprisonment<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The Criminal Procedure <\/i>Law [Consolidated Version<\/i>] 5742-1982<\/i> and the Penal Law<\/i> apply to every legal hearing concerning minors, unless there is an express provision to the contrary in the Youth Law.<\/i> Under Section 25(d) of the Youth Law<\/i> , a court may not impose a prison sentence on a minor who is under the age of 14 at the time of sentencing. When an offense has been committed by a person who was a minor on the day he\/she committed the offense, the death penalty may not be imposed. Even though other directives under the law allow for imprisonment in similar circumstances, namely if imprisonment is so prescribed by the law for the offenses that the minor is convicted of having committed, it is not obligatory to impose a life prison sentence, a mandatory prison sentence or a minimum penalty on a minor. In any case, the death penalty is not imposed in Israel, even on adults. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Last resort<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

As is demonstrated by Israel's Initial Report, over the years, from Israel's ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts, there has been a constant and extensive implementation by Israel of the rights guaranteed by these conventions, in a responsible and organized manner. From the initial planning and thinking stage, the State of Israel appointed expert committees, such as the Rotlevi Committee, to discuss and suggest the best manner in which to implement the rights guaranteed and adapt the internal legislation to international standards. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

This process created a culture in which close attention is paid to children's rights by the relevant authorities, and particularly to the rights of those who are in a vulnerable situation. The situation of arrest and interrogation is definitely considered such a delicate situation. The amendments to the laws that regulate the arrest of minors, from the preliminary and principle question of whether to conduct an arrest if there is a satisfactory alternative, as well as the conditions of their detention including its length, indicate that at every point the best interests of the child are borne in mind, whilst considering the public need with regard to criminal or security threats. Every aspect of the modification of the laws is designed to minimize the possible harm in this regard.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

In this respect, the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflicts elevates the protection of children's rights in general, and with regard to their arrest and detention in particular, and the state of Israel willingly acts in accordance with its obligations in this regard, as it will continue to do in the future. Thus, detention of children is only used as a measure of last resort and for the shortest period of time.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Please see also the final paragraph of Israel's response of Question 1, above. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

9. Please clarify whether the State party holds children, and from what age, in administrative detention on terrorist charges and how many children have been subjected to such measures. Please also clarify whether the State party has applied the Incarceration of Unlawful Combatants Law to children <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

10. In view of the large number of children who have died in the ongoing armed conflict and the disproportionately high number of Palestinian children among them, please inform the Committee of measures taken by the State party to ensure respect for the fundamental principles of proportionality and distinction between military objects and civilians and to establish accountability for violations of international humanitarian law.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

11. Please explain what measures have been taken to prevent direct attacks against schools and hospitals in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and establish accountability for such acts. Please inform the Committee of measures taken to ensure their reconstruction and please also provide information on measures taken to address the previous concerns and recommendations issued to the State party by the Committee in 2002 (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.195, paras. 44-45, 52- 53).<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : Please see the final paragraph of Israel's response to Question 1, above.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

12. With reference to the Committee’s recommendations issued to the State party in 2002 (CRC\/C\/15\/Add.195, paras. 31 and 32) to take all necessary measures to provide child victims of the armed conflict with adequate compensation, physical and psychological recovery as well as social reintegration, please indicate what measures the State party has taken in this regard.<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> :<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Victims of Hostilities – Government Assistance<\/u><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Victims of hostilities and their families are entitled by law to monetary remuneration and various benefits that are designed to assist and support them in their recovery, such as monthly benefits, rehabilitation, annual grants and lump-sum grants. The entitlement is provided under the Benefits for Victims of Hostilities Law<\/i> 5730 – 1970. The monetary benefits are provided under the Invalids (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Law<\/i> 5719 – 1959. They are calculated according to managerial grade civil service salaries and are updated along with updates in the economy (employment agreements or cost of living increments). Immediately after the occurrence of hostility-related injury, rehabilitation workers (specially trained social workers) contact the victims and their families. From that point, they are available to provide counseling, training and guidance with any problem – emotional, social and family related. They also guide family members on how to exercise their rights and obtain the various services that are due for them. Orphaned and disabled children are sensitively treated, and are entitled for the same rights and benefits provided to adults. Parents are actively integrated in the treatment and rehabilitation program of children victims. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The following table lists the deceased, orphaned and disabled children due to hostilities, who are entitled for National Institution Insurance's benefits, ages 0-17: <\/p><\/div>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\n\n

2005<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2006<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2007<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2008<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Deceased<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

225<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

231<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

230<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

246<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Orphaned<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

551<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

541<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

514<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

479<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Disabled<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

69<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

98<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

114<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

132<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n

\n

Source: National Insurance Institute, 2010<\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Civil Society<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

During Operation "Cast Lead", the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) conducted various programs to assist children from the south of Israel that were affected by the conflict. Thus, support was given to the shelters operating in Ashkelon, which were used during the operation as studying centers, kindergartens and alternative accommodation; and many volunteers assisted children who needed personal assistance in their studies, and helped to ease their stress and tension. In addition, thousands of hugging dolls, games and toys were distributed for the children of the area, and assisted them, together with their parents and the professionals who treated them, to overcome their trauma. Moreover, the JDC supported the National Council for Volunteering in Israel to implement a program in which youth from the southern area were invited to stay and live in Kiryat Shmonah in the north of Israel.<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

13. Please provide disaggregated data (including by sex, age group and country of origin) covering the years 2006, 2007 and 2008 on the number of asylum-seeking and refugee children coming to the State party from areas where children may have been recruited or used in hostilities. Please provide information on existing identification mechanisms and the procedure for considering refugee and asylum claims from children who have been recruited or used in situations of armed conflict. <\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Reply:<\/u><\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Statistics<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

\n

Between the years 2005 and 2006, there were five cases of child-soldiers who came into Israel, after being involved in the civil wars that occurred in West Africa. Three of the children were from Sierra Leone and two were from Liberia. They were all given, as an exception, refugee status in Israel. In addition, in 2002, a minor from Chad received refugee status in Israel, after escaping from a military camp in which he was held forcibly in order to take part in an armed conflict. <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

The five minors who entered Israel in 2005 and 2006, were recognized as refugees after legal analysis and discussions of their situation in light of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, and following an objective examination of each case which included varied parameters, such as the motivation of the minor for military involvement, the duration of such involvement, the level of cooperation of the minor and more. Eventually, it was decided that the Convention applied with regard to these minors, and they were granted with the status of refugees and provided with psychotherapy in Israel, and three of them were also placed in designated treatment. Two of these minors proceeded to higher education studies in the United Kingdom and the United States, and are planning to return to Israel after graduating.<\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Existing Mechanisms<\/u><\/i><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The Refugee Status Determination (RSD) Unit (henceforth: " the Unit<\/i> ") in the Population, Immigration and Border Authority (henceforth: "the Authority<\/i> ") within the Ministry of the Interior, was established in order to conduct thorough interviews for asylum seekers and provide written recommendations for further discussions in the Advisory Committee. The Unit began its operation in April 2009. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The Unit employs approximately 30 employees, including a general manager, two deputies, coordinators and interviewers. The recruitment of these employees was made based on a meeting between the Authority and the UNHCR. The conditions for acceptance include, inter alia<\/i> , having a bachelor's degree, high level English, previous experience in working with individuals and groups, and passing a group evaluation by an organizational psychologist. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The Unit's employees completed a six weeks course that began on March 1, 2009. The course was coordinated by representatives of the UNHCR in Israel and a representative of HIAS – The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, and was supervised and approved by the UNHCR management in Geneva. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The course emphasized various issues, including the 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees, the rules for conducting interviews, techniques, research methods, treatment of populations with special needs, formulating recommendations and reports and more. In order to qualify, each employee was required to pass weekly and final examinations with high scores. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

After completing the course, the employees began interviewing asylum seekers for a period of three months, during which they were all accompanied and inspected by the representatives of the UNHCR. Moreover, during the six months after completing the course, the Authority and the UNHCR conducted periodical meetings in order to identify difficulties, receive updates and assist in solving problems. The Unit's employees received additional professional training by the UNHCR. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

14. Please inform the Committee of the training and dissemination of the Protocol among relevant professional groups working at the national level with children who may have been recruited or used in hostilities, including migration authorities, lawyers, judges, medical professionals, social workers and journalists <\/i>. <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Reply<\/u><\/strong> : <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

The Government of Israel<\/u> <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

a) The Institute of Legal Training for Attorneys and Legal Advisers (henceforth: " the Institute<\/i> ") in the Ministry of Justice, is continuously operating seminars on human rights in general, and children's rights in particular, as detailed hereafter: <\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n