2025-UNAT-1522, Sanjaya Bahel
The UNAT held that the UNDT erred in suggesting that it was the former staff member鈥檚 burden to provide evidence to support his assertion that his request for review had been pending before the Dispute Tribunal since July 2009 and to produce a record of his case having been transferred to it from the JDC in July 2009.
The UNAT further held that the Administration鈥檚 response, that his claim was closed due to his failure to pursue it for over 12 years, was neither an administrative decision, nor was it the Administration鈥檚 prerogative to make regarding the judicial proceeding. The...