588 (2024), Martin Akerman
- Appealed
The UNAT held that the staff member鈥檚 motion for recusal of the UNAT Registrar had no merit. The UNAT noted that the decision to administratively close the case had been taken by the UNAT President and communicated to the parties as such by the UNAT Registrar in her letter. The UNAT found that it followed from the administrative closure of a case that parties no longer had the right to access the Court Case Management System under the case number in question. The UNAT held that the UNAT Registrar鈥檚 decisions to reject as manifestly inadmissible the staff member鈥檚 filings following the case...