UNDT/2023/001, Ular
The Tribunal held that there was insufficient evidence to support the conclusion that any distress caused to the Applicant was a result of the failure to resolve the harassment complaint and therefore an essential link in the requirement to prove moral damages had not been established by the evidence. The Tribunal noted that the finding that there was abuse of power was not based on an administrative act which was part of the Applicant鈥檚 application. The Applicant claimed that the delay was part of the harassment meted out by the Administration. However, she never provided evidence to link the...