UNDT/2022/066, Efamb'eodje
The Tribunal observed that it was not disputed that the impugned decision related to facts anterior to the Applicant鈥檚 appointment. Also not in dispute was the fact that no disciplinary process was initiated, and no disciplinary measure was taken against the Applicant. It followed that the impugned decision was not a disciplinary measure but was an administrative decision affecting the Applicant鈥檚 contract or terms of appointment under staff rule 11.2(a). Accordingly, the Applicant should have sought management evaluation before filing the application, which he did not do. The Tribunal further...