UNDT/2023/050, Asgedom
In this case, the facts were established and there was clear and convincing evidence that the Applicant committed fraud on purpose.
The Applicant鈥檚 conduct amounted to a breach of his basic obligations under staff regulations 1.2(b) and (g), staff rule 1.2(i), and the Strategic Framework for the Prevention of Fraud and Corruption.
The evidence is clear and convincing that the Applicant acted with knowledge and intent to mislead (and even with a possible personal economic interest).
Given the nature and gravity of the Applicant鈥檚 misconduct, the sanction is not absurd, unreasonable, or...