UNDT/2012/174

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the administrative decision not to promote him through a “rank-in-post exercise”, meaning an upgrading of his post from the P-3 to the P-4 level, in connection with a reorganisation of the United Nations Populations Fund (“UNFPA”), and the ensuing decision not to select him for the post of United Nations Reform Adviser at the P-5 level.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Agona

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement