UNDT/2021/084

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

At the time of the management evaluation, the contested decision had not been implemented and, therefore, had not had any impact on the Applicants’ terms of employment. The contested administrative decision did not, therefore, constitute a reviewable administrative decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Unilateral change in the individual workload standards for translation and self-revision.

Legal Principle(s)

Preparatory steps or actions can only be reviewed by the Dispute Tribunal in the context of an appeal against a final decision of the Administration that has direct legal consequences in the individual’s terms of employment.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

Outcome Extra Text

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ovcharenko et al, Kutner et al

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry